Finally the English version of 力挽狂瀾 ("Turning the Tide by Protecting the True Buddha Dharma") has been edited and released on YouTube! Many more English speakers could then get a chance to understand what Tibetan Buddhism (a fake Buddhist religion actually) is all about. Thanks to whoever contributes to this video!
Our goal as you can clearly see in the video is to disclose the true color of this evil religion, so as to protect numerous females from being sexually abused by those lamas who are actually indulged in sexual debauchery in secret. We are also a group of people who upholds and protects the true dharma of Buddha Sakyamuni, at the same time boldly destroys the evil ones and thereby saves the innocent women in reality.
The lamas in maroon robes are merely acting a show not only in front of their followers/adherents but the general public. Because Tibetan Buddhism is never a religion of Buddhism! It has just borrowed the Buddhist terms from orthodox Buddhism to cover up the tantric practice of Hinduism! Its tenet is fundamentally the Couple-Practice Tantra, which is about seeking the sexual climax during sexual intercourse indeed, and what's worse, it claims this mundane activity to be the method of attaining "Buddhahood" in a lifetime! It sounds really absurd and ridiculous because the true Buddhism has never taught the sentient beings to take sexual intercourse as a means through practicing the Buddha dharma. What those lamas/rinpoches do not know is that they have already committed a hell-bound sin from severe deception and adultery, and would certainly fall down to hell after death. How pitiful they are!! So revealing the truth and educating the general public seem to be much more important than anything else to us.
2012-02-24
Tibetan "Buddhists" Shed Crocodile Tears While Licking Blood
(By the True Heart News interviewing team in Taipei) Crowned with the halo of Nobel peace laureate and spiritual leader of Tibetan “Buddhism,” the Dalai Lama is in exile to India but travels around the world nonstop. He always cloaks himself in the guise of "compassion and wisdom." In 2001, he visited Taiwan the second time to "propagate the Buddha dharma" and called it "The Journey of Compassion and Wisdom." In 2003, he visited Japan and gave a speech entitled "The Power of Compassion," which just empty talk. Only people who are unaware of the truth, think that the Dalai Lama really has a heart that values compassion.
CEO of the True Enlightenment Foundation, Zhang Gongpu points out, despite of the facade that they painstakingly portray, Tibetan “Buddhism” really is ferocious and bloodthirsty in nature. The Dalai Lama has never understood the real meaning of compassion, and never acted the role of being compassionate either. On the contrary, he not only shows his relentless cruelty, but also is actually the manipulator of many violently bloodstained events from behind the scenes. Unfortunately, the Western media have always been lopsidedly biased. They romanticize the dream of Shambhala in their minds and project this fantasy onto the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama is only too willing to play along. As a result, the Western mass media often keep in line with the Dalai Lama promotion group’s wishes and carry them out faithfully. In actuality, Tibetan “Buddhism” speaks in one way, but thinks in another. The truth is a completely different story.
CEO Zhang turns the pages of a free booklet published by Tibet Religious Foundation of H. H. the Dalai Lama, Tibet and Tibetan Buddha Dharma. The contents of this booklet are the original text of Dalai's Japan speech in 2003, The Power of Compassion.1 On pages 15 to 18, Dalai talks elaborately about "the 911 event" happened in New York, Washington in 2001. He condemns the terrorists being "calculating, with brutal intention..." He also talks, incidentally or intentionally, about "great determination and impulse," "careful thinking and sophisticated calculation," and "months even years of meticulous planning." He mentions his visit at Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum as well. He talks about this historical event which occurred over sixty years ago; he expresses emphatically of his feeling of "being shocked by the brutal catastrophe instantly, absolutely terrified,” and of how “utterly stunned he was." CEO Zhang raises a question: Is this the way that a religious leader with such high profile should talk about compassion? American and Japanese people really do not need him to rub it in about these events. It is essentially a provocation to stir up people's emotion. It conjures up hatred and draws lines between enemies and friends. He grabs the opportunity to declare his stance on the American and Japanese people, and strives for recognition.
(Note 1: Tibet and Tibetan Buddha Dharma, first edition, free pocket books, Tibet Religious Foundation of H. H. The Dalai Lama, Sept. 2009, p.15-18)
CEO Zhang further points out that the strategy employed by Dalai was merely a show of “shedding crocodile tears.” Japan will never forget the sarin gas attack on March 20, 1995 in the Tokyo subway system, the worst terrorist attack in the post war period. Shoko Asahara, the mastermind and leader of the Aum Shinrikyo group, is a religious psychopath. At its inception, the group was founded on the principles of Mahayana Buddhism - self sacrifice and compassion - not on violence. In February of 1987, Shoko Asahara went to India and met with the 14th Dalai Lama. Later, during Dalai’s visit to Japan, Shoko Asahara was “blessed” by him and they formally entered a master and disciple relationship. Subsequently, Asahara became one of the largest financial supporters of the Dalai Lama, which gained him the role of a teacher of Tibetan Lamaism. Since that time, all the religious rituals of Aum Shinrikyo have been practiced in full accordance with practices of Tibetan Lamaism. The code of conduct of the Aum Shinrikyo group changed from the earlier ethical view of Mahayana Buddhism (compassionate heart, etc.) to what scholar Yelü Dashi calls the “reversal principle” of Lamaism in which any violations of social morals – even criminal acts - are not considered taboo because, as Asahara wrote, “To convert the worst thing into the best thing; this is the tantric way of thinking.” Thus, Asahara had no hesitation in committing the sarin gas murders which shocked the world.
http://www.a202.idv.tw/a202-big5/Book6002/Book6002-0-15.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoko_Asahara
What is more, says CEO Zhang, Asahara and his followers had even developed various biochemical, laser and electromagnetic weapons and manufactured traditional weapons e.g. AK-47 rifles and so on for “the last battle of Shambhala.” It was a prophecy made by the guru of Tibetan “Buddhism” saying that bloody means would be employed for Tibetan “Buddhism” to rule the world completely. The CEO questions further: In Dalai Lama’s recent address to the Japanese on “the power of compassion,” why was there no mention of his outstanding disciple, Asahara? Zhang quotes that, from Yelü Dashi’s viewpoint, the Dalai Lama and Asahara are in fact playing different roles of the same nature. One is acting as the “Goddess of Mercy-Avalokitesvara,” while the other is acting as “Buddha’s” embodiment of the wrathful deity form Yama, the God of Hell. One is the bright side, the other is the shadow side and both are, in fact, of the same “bodily entity.” Yelü explains that this kind of role playing in Tibetan “Buddhism” is not accidental, it is a necessity. The Dalai Lama must shift his inner tyrannical nature to Heruka, a wrathful deity, in order for himself to become the “bright Goddess of Mercy-Avalokitesvara.” CEO Zhang explains, the so-called “power of compassion” is in fact to use the “ruthless power” of his disciple Asahara to pave the road so that the teacher Dalai can appear at the bloody aftermath to reap the advantages of his “compassionate” image.
http://www.a202.idv.tw/a202-big5/Book6002/Book6002-0-15.htm
CEO Zhang adds that during the Dalai Lama’s second visit to Taiwan in 2001, questions were raised by Tibetan “Buddhism” adherents as to whether there was sufficient reason for the Dalai Lama to discourage others from worshiping the Dharma Protector Dorje Shugden (who is now regarded as a malevolent deity within Dalai Lama’s tradition of the Gelug Sect but who is still worshiped by a conservative faction), or whether this move was against religious freedom and so on. 1 In reply to those queries, the Dalai Lama admitted that he used to be a practitioner of the Dharma Protector Dorje Shugden. Then he immediately turned around to cite the history of Tibetan “Buddhism” and its internal political struggles as well as conflicts as proof that Dorje Shugden is an evil-will spirit. As well, he put the blame on the adherents of Dorje Shugden for the murder event within the Tibetan exile community in India. He further stated that those who continue to propitiate Dorje Shugden should not attend his religious teachings in the future.
CEO Zhang cited from “A Talk on the Tibetan Culture” 2 that the political decisions in Dharamsala, in fact, usually rely on astrology, divination, and even “possession" of certain lamas by the Dharma Protector Deity to convey heavenly messages. This sort of superstitious leadership is just like Yang Xiuqing during the time period of Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, who together with some “high ranking officials” used the guise of “Holy Father possessed” to snatch political and religious right of speech in an internal power struggle. Most of those lamas who were previously used for divine-possession were later on charged with “fake possession” and then sent to prison. Yet, the most prominent practitioner of the Dorje Shugden Dharma Protector was the direct dharma tutor and spiritual guide of the 14th Dalai Lama – Trijang Rinpoche, a Living “Buddha.”
(Note 1: Compassion and Wisdom, first edition, free pocket books, Tibet Religious Foundation of H.H. the Dalai Lama, Sept. 2008, p.220-225)
(Note 2: A Talk on the Tibetan Culture, ‘the Dorje Shugden Controversy’, p. 106-119)
There was another branch of the “evil dharma protector deity” within the Gelug Sect, which spread the rumor that the adherents of Dorje Shugden intended to murder the 14th Dalai Lama, thus setting off a crisis. On March 30, 1996, after his tutor Trijang Rinpoche passed away, Dalai government issued an “explicit ban” formally prohibiting worshiping of Dorje Shugden. Meanwhile, a door to door search for the worshippers of Shugden was conducted by Dalai ’s men, thereby Shugden alters were all destroyed and the worshippers were assaulted by hired masked thugs when in the non-Gelug areas. Thereafter, things escalated from banning to expulsion to intimidation to murder and eventually armed fights between the two sides.
The most bloody incident took place on Feb. 4, 1997: Lobsang Gyatso, a confidant of the Dalai Lama, an opponent of Dorje Shugden, and the founder of the Institute of Buddhist Dialectics in Dharamsala, and his two students were found dead nearby the Dalai Lama’s residence. Their throats were cut, their blood was drained and their skin was peeled off. The whole gruesome act was completed within an hour. This is the murder case which the Dalai Lama blamed on the Shugden group during the question-and-answer session of a speech. But the Shugdens are strongly convinced that both cases of murder and human sacrifice were carried out by the Dalai Lama’s men in order to set up the Shugdens. Der Spiegel, a German magazine, has voiced out for the Shugdens on this issue, asking the Dalai Lama not to persecute them anymore. This is just another proof of fact that the promulgation of "democracy," "human rights," and "religious freedom" from the Tibetan government-in-exile is bogus and is, as usual, designed specially to delude those believers who have a fantasy about Shangri-La.
CEO Zhang points out, infighting of political factions among the senior officials of Tibetan government-in-exile and different sects of Tibetan “Buddhism” are treacherous and bloody. In order to protect himself and fortify his authority, the Dalai Lama did not hesitate to suppress his own people and turn against the “Dharma Protector” Dorje Shugden, to whom he was faithful in his early years. To eradicate dissidents, the Dalai Lama sat on his hands to watch Shugden followers be persecuted or even sacrificed.
The means which the Dalai took against his rivals internally was no less than the actions of totalitarian government of World War II. Externally, he actually employed violent terrorist attacks (such as the action of Shoko Asahara, Shinrikyo group). Was there ever any compassion at all? The Dalai Lama is a hypocrite, good at disguising himself and vying for media attention. Unfortunately, the world, unaware of the truth, has been misled into believing he has a halo while he indulges in the idolatry.
CEO Zhang refers to Mr. Goldner Colin from Freistaat Bayern, Germany, who lived and worked in Tibet, Nepal and India for many years and conducted research and investigations for three years in Dharamsala, home to the Tibetan government-in-exile. Mr. Goldner discovered that Tibet as described by the Dalai Lama, is purely fictitious and for propagation only. The true condition is far cry from this. His conclusion is that Dalai Lama is a hypocrite and has disguised himself as a saint. Goldner sighs:
“The world's high regard which ‘His Holiness’ enjoys across all political and ideological camp, despite all the criticism raised against him for quite some time, remains completely unbroken. He still is regarded as symbol of peacefulness, kindness, and in infinite wisdom of resting serenity. His pronouncements, no matter how trivial, are therefore regarded as the highest expression of knowledge. Such glorifying view of the Dalai Lama is pure projection, based on blatant ignorance of the actual connections.”
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kc4580455/13439377
CEO Zhang reminds that “Stones from the hills can be used to polish gems.” This Western observer’s wise and rational research and analysis may awake those who blindly idolatrize Tibetan “Buddhism” and might give them the chance to see the Dalai Lama’s true colors and his brutal nature. Do not be fooled by the crocodile tears nor feel sympathetic towards the cat which mourns for the mice with fresh blood still on its whiskers! (Reported by the Interviewing Team) 2011
Editor’s Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on July 19, 2011.
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/24
CEO of the True Enlightenment Foundation, Zhang Gongpu points out, despite of the facade that they painstakingly portray, Tibetan “Buddhism” really is ferocious and bloodthirsty in nature. The Dalai Lama has never understood the real meaning of compassion, and never acted the role of being compassionate either. On the contrary, he not only shows his relentless cruelty, but also is actually the manipulator of many violently bloodstained events from behind the scenes. Unfortunately, the Western media have always been lopsidedly biased. They romanticize the dream of Shambhala in their minds and project this fantasy onto the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama is only too willing to play along. As a result, the Western mass media often keep in line with the Dalai Lama promotion group’s wishes and carry them out faithfully. In actuality, Tibetan “Buddhism” speaks in one way, but thinks in another. The truth is a completely different story.
CEO Zhang turns the pages of a free booklet published by Tibet Religious Foundation of H. H. the Dalai Lama, Tibet and Tibetan Buddha Dharma. The contents of this booklet are the original text of Dalai's Japan speech in 2003, The Power of Compassion.1 On pages 15 to 18, Dalai talks elaborately about "the 911 event" happened in New York, Washington in 2001. He condemns the terrorists being "calculating, with brutal intention..." He also talks, incidentally or intentionally, about "great determination and impulse," "careful thinking and sophisticated calculation," and "months even years of meticulous planning." He mentions his visit at Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum as well. He talks about this historical event which occurred over sixty years ago; he expresses emphatically of his feeling of "being shocked by the brutal catastrophe instantly, absolutely terrified,” and of how “utterly stunned he was." CEO Zhang raises a question: Is this the way that a religious leader with such high profile should talk about compassion? American and Japanese people really do not need him to rub it in about these events. It is essentially a provocation to stir up people's emotion. It conjures up hatred and draws lines between enemies and friends. He grabs the opportunity to declare his stance on the American and Japanese people, and strives for recognition.
(Note 1: Tibet and Tibetan Buddha Dharma, first edition, free pocket books, Tibet Religious Foundation of H. H. The Dalai Lama, Sept. 2009, p.15-18)
CEO Zhang further points out that the strategy employed by Dalai was merely a show of “shedding crocodile tears.” Japan will never forget the sarin gas attack on March 20, 1995 in the Tokyo subway system, the worst terrorist attack in the post war period. Shoko Asahara, the mastermind and leader of the Aum Shinrikyo group, is a religious psychopath. At its inception, the group was founded on the principles of Mahayana Buddhism - self sacrifice and compassion - not on violence. In February of 1987, Shoko Asahara went to India and met with the 14th Dalai Lama. Later, during Dalai’s visit to Japan, Shoko Asahara was “blessed” by him and they formally entered a master and disciple relationship. Subsequently, Asahara became one of the largest financial supporters of the Dalai Lama, which gained him the role of a teacher of Tibetan Lamaism. Since that time, all the religious rituals of Aum Shinrikyo have been practiced in full accordance with practices of Tibetan Lamaism. The code of conduct of the Aum Shinrikyo group changed from the earlier ethical view of Mahayana Buddhism (compassionate heart, etc.) to what scholar Yelü Dashi calls the “reversal principle” of Lamaism in which any violations of social morals – even criminal acts - are not considered taboo because, as Asahara wrote, “To convert the worst thing into the best thing; this is the tantric way of thinking.” Thus, Asahara had no hesitation in committing the sarin gas murders which shocked the world.
http://www.a202.idv.tw/a202-big5/Book6002/Book6002-0-15.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoko_Asahara
What is more, says CEO Zhang, Asahara and his followers had even developed various biochemical, laser and electromagnetic weapons and manufactured traditional weapons e.g. AK-47 rifles and so on for “the last battle of Shambhala.” It was a prophecy made by the guru of Tibetan “Buddhism” saying that bloody means would be employed for Tibetan “Buddhism” to rule the world completely. The CEO questions further: In Dalai Lama’s recent address to the Japanese on “the power of compassion,” why was there no mention of his outstanding disciple, Asahara? Zhang quotes that, from Yelü Dashi’s viewpoint, the Dalai Lama and Asahara are in fact playing different roles of the same nature. One is acting as the “Goddess of Mercy-Avalokitesvara,” while the other is acting as “Buddha’s” embodiment of the wrathful deity form Yama, the God of Hell. One is the bright side, the other is the shadow side and both are, in fact, of the same “bodily entity.” Yelü explains that this kind of role playing in Tibetan “Buddhism” is not accidental, it is a necessity. The Dalai Lama must shift his inner tyrannical nature to Heruka, a wrathful deity, in order for himself to become the “bright Goddess of Mercy-Avalokitesvara.” CEO Zhang explains, the so-called “power of compassion” is in fact to use the “ruthless power” of his disciple Asahara to pave the road so that the teacher Dalai can appear at the bloody aftermath to reap the advantages of his “compassionate” image.
http://www.a202.idv.tw/a202-big5/Book6002/Book6002-0-15.htm
CEO Zhang adds that during the Dalai Lama’s second visit to Taiwan in 2001, questions were raised by Tibetan “Buddhism” adherents as to whether there was sufficient reason for the Dalai Lama to discourage others from worshiping the Dharma Protector Dorje Shugden (who is now regarded as a malevolent deity within Dalai Lama’s tradition of the Gelug Sect but who is still worshiped by a conservative faction), or whether this move was against religious freedom and so on. 1 In reply to those queries, the Dalai Lama admitted that he used to be a practitioner of the Dharma Protector Dorje Shugden. Then he immediately turned around to cite the history of Tibetan “Buddhism” and its internal political struggles as well as conflicts as proof that Dorje Shugden is an evil-will spirit. As well, he put the blame on the adherents of Dorje Shugden for the murder event within the Tibetan exile community in India. He further stated that those who continue to propitiate Dorje Shugden should not attend his religious teachings in the future.
CEO Zhang cited from “A Talk on the Tibetan Culture” 2 that the political decisions in Dharamsala, in fact, usually rely on astrology, divination, and even “possession" of certain lamas by the Dharma Protector Deity to convey heavenly messages. This sort of superstitious leadership is just like Yang Xiuqing during the time period of Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, who together with some “high ranking officials” used the guise of “Holy Father possessed” to snatch political and religious right of speech in an internal power struggle. Most of those lamas who were previously used for divine-possession were later on charged with “fake possession” and then sent to prison. Yet, the most prominent practitioner of the Dorje Shugden Dharma Protector was the direct dharma tutor and spiritual guide of the 14th Dalai Lama – Trijang Rinpoche, a Living “Buddha.”
(Note 1: Compassion and Wisdom, first edition, free pocket books, Tibet Religious Foundation of H.H. the Dalai Lama, Sept. 2008, p.220-225)
(Note 2: A Talk on the Tibetan Culture, ‘the Dorje Shugden Controversy’, p. 106-119)
There was another branch of the “evil dharma protector deity” within the Gelug Sect, which spread the rumor that the adherents of Dorje Shugden intended to murder the 14th Dalai Lama, thus setting off a crisis. On March 30, 1996, after his tutor Trijang Rinpoche passed away, Dalai government issued an “explicit ban” formally prohibiting worshiping of Dorje Shugden. Meanwhile, a door to door search for the worshippers of Shugden was conducted by Dalai ’s men, thereby Shugden alters were all destroyed and the worshippers were assaulted by hired masked thugs when in the non-Gelug areas. Thereafter, things escalated from banning to expulsion to intimidation to murder and eventually armed fights between the two sides.
The most bloody incident took place on Feb. 4, 1997: Lobsang Gyatso, a confidant of the Dalai Lama, an opponent of Dorje Shugden, and the founder of the Institute of Buddhist Dialectics in Dharamsala, and his two students were found dead nearby the Dalai Lama’s residence. Their throats were cut, their blood was drained and their skin was peeled off. The whole gruesome act was completed within an hour. This is the murder case which the Dalai Lama blamed on the Shugden group during the question-and-answer session of a speech. But the Shugdens are strongly convinced that both cases of murder and human sacrifice were carried out by the Dalai Lama’s men in order to set up the Shugdens. Der Spiegel, a German magazine, has voiced out for the Shugdens on this issue, asking the Dalai Lama not to persecute them anymore. This is just another proof of fact that the promulgation of "democracy," "human rights," and "religious freedom" from the Tibetan government-in-exile is bogus and is, as usual, designed specially to delude those believers who have a fantasy about Shangri-La.
CEO Zhang points out, infighting of political factions among the senior officials of Tibetan government-in-exile and different sects of Tibetan “Buddhism” are treacherous and bloody. In order to protect himself and fortify his authority, the Dalai Lama did not hesitate to suppress his own people and turn against the “Dharma Protector” Dorje Shugden, to whom he was faithful in his early years. To eradicate dissidents, the Dalai Lama sat on his hands to watch Shugden followers be persecuted or even sacrificed.
The means which the Dalai took against his rivals internally was no less than the actions of totalitarian government of World War II. Externally, he actually employed violent terrorist attacks (such as the action of Shoko Asahara, Shinrikyo group). Was there ever any compassion at all? The Dalai Lama is a hypocrite, good at disguising himself and vying for media attention. Unfortunately, the world, unaware of the truth, has been misled into believing he has a halo while he indulges in the idolatry.
CEO Zhang refers to Mr. Goldner Colin from Freistaat Bayern, Germany, who lived and worked in Tibet, Nepal and India for many years and conducted research and investigations for three years in Dharamsala, home to the Tibetan government-in-exile. Mr. Goldner discovered that Tibet as described by the Dalai Lama, is purely fictitious and for propagation only. The true condition is far cry from this. His conclusion is that Dalai Lama is a hypocrite and has disguised himself as a saint. Goldner sighs:
“The world's high regard which ‘His Holiness’ enjoys across all political and ideological camp, despite all the criticism raised against him for quite some time, remains completely unbroken. He still is regarded as symbol of peacefulness, kindness, and in infinite wisdom of resting serenity. His pronouncements, no matter how trivial, are therefore regarded as the highest expression of knowledge. Such glorifying view of the Dalai Lama is pure projection, based on blatant ignorance of the actual connections.”
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kc4580455/13439377
CEO Zhang reminds that “Stones from the hills can be used to polish gems.” This Western observer’s wise and rational research and analysis may awake those who blindly idolatrize Tibetan “Buddhism” and might give them the chance to see the Dalai Lama’s true colors and his brutal nature. Do not be fooled by the crocodile tears nor feel sympathetic towards the cat which mourns for the mice with fresh blood still on its whiskers! (Reported by the Interviewing Team) 2011
Editor’s Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on July 19, 2011.
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/24
2012-02-19
癌細胞怕熱 ; 一天五杯熱水 (轉貼文)
癌細胞怕熱 ; 一天五杯熱水，完全排毒！
癌細胞怕熱
最近我看了數本日本石原結實醫師寫的書，書中常提及「癌細胞怕熱」的觀念，覺得蠻有意思的，把它記下來跟大家分享，也算是我的讀書筆記。
石原 醫師認為，現在醫學已非常進步，醫師也愈來愈多，癌症卻依然有增無減，其中一個很大的因素，就是現代人普遍體溫低下，因人體體溫降至35度時，正是癌細胞最活躍繁殖的時候，反之，當體溫達到39.6度以上時，癌細胞就會全部死掉。
高溫可治好癌症
19世紀時，德國有位布許（Busch）醫師，發表多例自然治癒的癌症，也就是有罹癌病人，分別得到肺炎和丹毒（一種皮膚感染症）等疾病，連續發高燒1-2星期，沒想到意外治好癌症。
此外，1900年美國紐約市立醫院的科萊醫師，同樣發表有癌症病人因肺炎和丹毒引起持續高燒後，治癒癌症的實例。
換句話說，西洋醫學也已明白癌細胞很怕高溫。
癌症是一種從頭到腳都有可能發病的疾病，但心臟、脾臟、小腸（十二指腸）是發生癌症機率較小的器官。
那是因為心臟雖只有體重的1/200，卻負責提供1/9的體溫；脾臟則是紅血球集中的地方（※註：脾臟的功能係破壞老舊的紅血球，將紅血球的血紅素與鐵分離，被分離的鐵可再度被吸收到血液中），同樣屬於高溫器官；而小腸要負責消化，必須經常活動，自然會比較溫熱，從這些事實可知，癌症並不容易發生在溫度高的器官上。
人體容易罹癌的器官如食道、肺、胃、大腸、直腸、卵巢、子宮………等，都是中間呈空洞的器官，有空洞的器官，細胞會比較少，體溫也比較容易下降，所以比較容易罹癌；至於乳房因突出身體外面，也是溫度比較低的器官，
故乳癌發生率也較高。
一般而言，癌症是因免疫力下降而形成，當然與血液有關連，也可以說它的發生與血液循環不佳有密切關係。
東洋醫學認為「萬病之源來自髒血」，所以，身體為了燃燒並排出體內的廢物，讓血液變乾淨，才會出現發燒的反應。
就某個層面來說，發燒其實能提高免疫力，而免疫力就是白血球的運作能力，實際上只要體溫上升1度，免疫力就能提高5－6倍。
一旦身體冰冷，血液循環會變差，體內細胞的代謝也會變差，體溫每下降1度，代謝就會減少約12％，免疫力也會降低30％。
通常人體體溫最低的時候，也是死亡率最高的時候，一天當中，凌晨3－5點的體溫最低，這時也是最容易引發氣喘、潰瘍性大腸炎的激烈腹痛、異型狹心症等疾病的時候。
現代人體溫低下的原因
人體平靜時的體溫約有1/4來自肌肉，但現代人卻不像從前的人一樣常走路，也沒有以前的人勤快，開始用機器來取代雙手打掃和洗衣，這種運動不生足的的結果，就是體溫降低的ㄧ大原因。
加上現代人常見壓力問題，壓力一大，腎上腺就會分泌腎上腺素，使血管收縮，造成血液循環不良，長期持續下去，自然會讓體溫降低。
一到夏天多數人會整天躲在冷氣房裡，及平常攝取過多造成體質寒涼的食物，都是造成體溫低下的原因。（可別再相信任何啥款機飲食了）
高體溫的方法
不只是癌症，要同時預防罹患生活習慣病（包含高血脂、高血壓、高血糖、高尿酸等病症），一定要設法提高體溫，其方法如下：
運動－ 肌肉約佔全身體重的45％， 是人體最大的器官，所以只要運動，肌肉所產出的熱量就會愈大，甚至達到體溫的一半。
體溫上升有助於促進新陳代謝，白血球的運作也會活躍，運動過後身體會覺得很輕，就連心情都覺得舒爽，主因就是體溫上升，促使體內的廢物和血液中的多餘養分被燃燒，甚至被轉換成汗水和尿液排出，以及透過吐氣被排出，等於在體內做ㄧ次大掃除。
要解忙碌現代人運動不足的煩惱，最簡單的方式就是「走路」。
泡澡--- 日常生活中最簡單又有效的溫熱身體方法，就是泡澡。
採用全身泡在浴缸的入浴法，使水溫幫助擴張血管，促進血液循環，使得內臟和肌肉得以補充到氧氣和養分，進而促使腎臟和肺排出廢物。
此外，流體靜力平衡 （或稱靜水壓平衡）具有讓肌肉緊實的效果，且這種流體靜力平衡會壓迫血管和淋巴管，促進血液和淋巴液的循環，讓全身代謝跟著活躍起來，尤其位在下半身的腎臟血流也會變好，自然會增加排尿量，改善水毒狀況，進而除去水腫和冰冷現象。
食用溫熱食物－ 石原醫師鼓勵大家，平常應食用可溫熱身體的食物如乳酪、蕎麥麵、黑麵包、糙米、根莖類蔬菜、海藻、薑、味噌、蘋果、櫻桃、葡萄、黑糖、紅茶………等。 想要讓身體溫熱的快速方法，就是喝生薑紅茶。
生薑最大的功效就是溫熱身體，而住在寒冷地區的歐洲人習慣喝紅茶，藉以溫熱身體，如將紅茶加入生薑，就能發揮更大的效果，使身體熱起來。
中藥的古籍就記載著「生薑能去百邪」，16世紀時，英國爆發黑死病大流行，至少有1/3的倫敦市民因而喪命，卻意外發現平時常吃生薑的人，都倖存下來，因此，當時的英王亨利八世，大力提倡多吃生薑，現在英國坊間到處可見的薑餅，就是當時留下來的深刻影響。
2006年密西根大學綜合癌症中心研究人員，在美國癌症學會上發表「將市面上販售的生薑粉泡開後，投入培養中的卵巢癌細胞裡，結果癌細胞全死了，足見發生了細胞凋亡與細胞自噬的作用」，雖然這項實驗所用的癌細胞是「卵巢癌細胞」，但相信這個實驗對所有癌細胞都具有同樣效果。
看了 石原 醫師的書，才知人體發燒正是自體提升免疫力的機制，更重要的是體溫達到39.6度以上，可以熱死癌細胞。
我常在想，要是我開刀前也能發燒，癌症也許就不藥而癒，就可少挨那一刀，也免受化療之苦。前一陣子，有家人感冒發燒了，我特地恭喜他自體悶燒，大概把不少體內癌細胞給熱斃了！
自從罹癌後，有很多人告訴我，這不能吃，那不能吃，讓我很困擾我該吃什麼呢？
但現在的我肯定會把以前不愛吃的，統統吞下肚，希望藉此提升自己的免疫力，達到自癒的效果。
白湯排毒法 一天五杯熱水，完全排毒！
現在日本的藝能界流行一種“白湯”排毒法！日文的“湯”就是熱水，而“白湯”就是什麼都不加的熱水！
這種療法源自於印度的阿育吠陀(Aayurveda) ，藉由喝溫熱的水讓身體熱起來，達到和用芝麻油按摩讓身體熱起來同樣的效果！
由於實行起來非常簡單，每個人都做得到，也不用花錢，因此由藝人千葉麗子推薦之後， 許多藝人紛紛仿效，成為一股風潮！
先說說喝熱水具備哪些效果吧:
1.促進新陳代謝
喝熱水不僅能夠刺激腸胃蠕動，也能促進腎臟肝臟等器官的活動！
維持擔任排毒重責大任的器官的活性， 讓血液能夠更輕鬆的運輸氧氣與養分到全身，促進新陳代謝！
2.調整味覺
開始喝熱水，會感覺到溫水的甜味！
慢慢的你會對於食物的味道越來越敏銳！
稍微吃一點就會有吃了東西的實感，進而避免暴飲暴食！
3.排出毒素
熱水能夠溫暖內臟器官，促進消化，讓囤積在體內的毒素排出體外！
除了有利尿作用之外，因為體內水分的調節，更能夠改善便秘！
此外也能加速排汗， 達到良好的排毒效果！
4.賦予滿腹飽足感
和一般的水比起來，喝熱水需要花時間一口一口慢慢喝，因此更能夠獲得滿腹感！
在吃飯的時候搭配食物一起喝，更能夠增加飽足感！
5.幫助消化
經常暴飲暴食會影響消化，並讓無法消化的食物開始囤積在體內！
熱水可以刺激胃的蠕動，幫助消化，並幫助囤積的老廢物質順勢排出！
6.沉澱心情
除了身體機能的調整之外，喝熱水也具有精神層面排毒的功效！
慢慢的喝杯熱水，能夠緩衝一下忙碌的工作，消除壓力， 讓你神清氣爽！
根據阿育吠陀(Aayurveda)的說法，
影響人類身體與精神健康的元素可以從風，火，水三種元素來看！
頭痛，肩頸酸痛，失眠，肌膚粗糙，便秘等都是因為火的元素失調的關係，追究原因就是身體“太冷”！
夏天經常吹冷氣，吃冰的東西，內外夾攻，這時候喝熱水就是一種均衡的消化劑！
雖然喝熱水排毒非常簡單，但也不是隨便喝喝就能達到最好的效果喔！
在喝法上還是有些講究的:
1.早上起床喝一杯熱水
早上起床喝一馬克杯的熱水，水溫在不要燙口，能夠順順喝下的溫度最好！
能夠溫熱內臟器官，溶解體內的老廢物質，加速排出！
讓一天有個神清氣爽的開始！
2.一天喝1.2~ 1.5公升的熱水
任何東西過量都不好！雖然喝熱水沒有副作用，但是以為這樣而狂飲的話，反而會造成多餘的水分在體內囤積，新陳代謝惡化，成為寒冷體質，進而容易肥胖！
一天1.2~ 1.5公升的量最適中！
3.一次一點點慢慢喝，不要牛飲
不要在渴的時候咕嘟咕嘟狂飲，最好是每次半杯小口小口慢慢喝！
1~2個小時喝一杯左右的量！不要燙口的熱水，溫熱就可以了！
4.入浴後水分補給
洗完澡後， 喝一杯溫水(和體溫差不多的溫水)，補充流失的水分！
這時候好不容易藉由泡澡讓身體溫熱起來，最好避免喝冰的東西，讓身體冷卻！
經過日本許多明星的實踐證明:
熱水排毒法能夠提升基礎代謝，讓身體覺得輕鬆舒暢，改善便秘，排出老廢物質，進而達到美肌與瘦身的效果！
這種不花錢的健康排毒法，還不趕快試試?！
（以上是轉載的好文章）
癌細胞怕熱
最近我看了數本日本石原結實醫師寫的書，書中常提及「癌細胞怕熱」的觀念，覺得蠻有意思的，把它記下來跟大家分享，也算是我的讀書筆記。
石原 醫師認為，現在醫學已非常進步，醫師也愈來愈多，癌症卻依然有增無減，其中一個很大的因素，就是現代人普遍體溫低下，因人體體溫降至35度時，正是癌細胞最活躍繁殖的時候，反之，當體溫達到39.6度以上時，癌細胞就會全部死掉。
高溫可治好癌症
19世紀時，德國有位布許（Busch）醫師，發表多例自然治癒的癌症，也就是有罹癌病人，分別得到肺炎和丹毒（一種皮膚感染症）等疾病，連續發高燒1-2星期，沒想到意外治好癌症。
此外，1900年美國紐約市立醫院的科萊醫師，同樣發表有癌症病人因肺炎和丹毒引起持續高燒後，治癒癌症的實例。
換句話說，西洋醫學也已明白癌細胞很怕高溫。
癌症是一種從頭到腳都有可能發病的疾病，但心臟、脾臟、小腸（十二指腸）是發生癌症機率較小的器官。
那是因為心臟雖只有體重的1/200，卻負責提供1/9的體溫；脾臟則是紅血球集中的地方（※註：脾臟的功能係破壞老舊的紅血球，將紅血球的血紅素與鐵分離，被分離的鐵可再度被吸收到血液中），同樣屬於高溫器官；而小腸要負責消化，必須經常活動，自然會比較溫熱，從這些事實可知，癌症並不容易發生在溫度高的器官上。
人體容易罹癌的器官如食道、肺、胃、大腸、直腸、卵巢、子宮………等，都是中間呈空洞的器官，有空洞的器官，細胞會比較少，體溫也比較容易下降，所以比較容易罹癌；至於乳房因突出身體外面，也是溫度比較低的器官，
故乳癌發生率也較高。
一般而言，癌症是因免疫力下降而形成，當然與血液有關連，也可以說它的發生與血液循環不佳有密切關係。
東洋醫學認為「萬病之源來自髒血」，所以，身體為了燃燒並排出體內的廢物，讓血液變乾淨，才會出現發燒的反應。
就某個層面來說，發燒其實能提高免疫力，而免疫力就是白血球的運作能力，實際上只要體溫上升1度，免疫力就能提高5－6倍。
一旦身體冰冷，血液循環會變差，體內細胞的代謝也會變差，體溫每下降1度，代謝就會減少約12％，免疫力也會降低30％。
通常人體體溫最低的時候，也是死亡率最高的時候，一天當中，凌晨3－5點的體溫最低，這時也是最容易引發氣喘、潰瘍性大腸炎的激烈腹痛、異型狹心症等疾病的時候。
現代人體溫低下的原因
人體平靜時的體溫約有1/4來自肌肉，但現代人卻不像從前的人一樣常走路，也沒有以前的人勤快，開始用機器來取代雙手打掃和洗衣，這種運動不生足的的結果，就是體溫降低的ㄧ大原因。
加上現代人常見壓力問題，壓力一大，腎上腺就會分泌腎上腺素，使血管收縮，造成血液循環不良，長期持續下去，自然會讓體溫降低。
一到夏天多數人會整天躲在冷氣房裡，及平常攝取過多造成體質寒涼的食物，都是造成體溫低下的原因。（可別再相信任何啥款機飲食了）
高體溫的方法
不只是癌症，要同時預防罹患生活習慣病（包含高血脂、高血壓、高血糖、高尿酸等病症），一定要設法提高體溫，其方法如下：
運動－ 肌肉約佔全身體重的45％， 是人體最大的器官，所以只要運動，肌肉所產出的熱量就會愈大，甚至達到體溫的一半。
體溫上升有助於促進新陳代謝，白血球的運作也會活躍，運動過後身體會覺得很輕，就連心情都覺得舒爽，主因就是體溫上升，促使體內的廢物和血液中的多餘養分被燃燒，甚至被轉換成汗水和尿液排出，以及透過吐氣被排出，等於在體內做ㄧ次大掃除。
要解忙碌現代人運動不足的煩惱，最簡單的方式就是「走路」。
泡澡--- 日常生活中最簡單又有效的溫熱身體方法，就是泡澡。
採用全身泡在浴缸的入浴法，使水溫幫助擴張血管，促進血液循環，使得內臟和肌肉得以補充到氧氣和養分，進而促使腎臟和肺排出廢物。
此外，流體靜力平衡 （或稱靜水壓平衡）具有讓肌肉緊實的效果，且這種流體靜力平衡會壓迫血管和淋巴管，促進血液和淋巴液的循環，讓全身代謝跟著活躍起來，尤其位在下半身的腎臟血流也會變好，自然會增加排尿量，改善水毒狀況，進而除去水腫和冰冷現象。
食用溫熱食物－ 石原醫師鼓勵大家，平常應食用可溫熱身體的食物如乳酪、蕎麥麵、黑麵包、糙米、根莖類蔬菜、海藻、薑、味噌、蘋果、櫻桃、葡萄、黑糖、紅茶………等。 想要讓身體溫熱的快速方法，就是喝生薑紅茶。
生薑最大的功效就是溫熱身體，而住在寒冷地區的歐洲人習慣喝紅茶，藉以溫熱身體，如將紅茶加入生薑，就能發揮更大的效果，使身體熱起來。
中藥的古籍就記載著「生薑能去百邪」，16世紀時，英國爆發黑死病大流行，至少有1/3的倫敦市民因而喪命，卻意外發現平時常吃生薑的人，都倖存下來，因此，當時的英王亨利八世，大力提倡多吃生薑，現在英國坊間到處可見的薑餅，就是當時留下來的深刻影響。
2006年密西根大學綜合癌症中心研究人員，在美國癌症學會上發表「將市面上販售的生薑粉泡開後，投入培養中的卵巢癌細胞裡，結果癌細胞全死了，足見發生了細胞凋亡與細胞自噬的作用」，雖然這項實驗所用的癌細胞是「卵巢癌細胞」，但相信這個實驗對所有癌細胞都具有同樣效果。
看了 石原 醫師的書，才知人體發燒正是自體提升免疫力的機制，更重要的是體溫達到39.6度以上，可以熱死癌細胞。
我常在想，要是我開刀前也能發燒，癌症也許就不藥而癒，就可少挨那一刀，也免受化療之苦。前一陣子，有家人感冒發燒了，我特地恭喜他自體悶燒，大概把不少體內癌細胞給熱斃了！
自從罹癌後，有很多人告訴我，這不能吃，那不能吃，讓我很困擾我該吃什麼呢？
但現在的我肯定會把以前不愛吃的，統統吞下肚，希望藉此提升自己的免疫力，達到自癒的效果。
白湯排毒法 一天五杯熱水，完全排毒！
現在日本的藝能界流行一種“白湯”排毒法！日文的“湯”就是熱水，而“白湯”就是什麼都不加的熱水！
這種療法源自於印度的阿育吠陀(Aayurveda) ，藉由喝溫熱的水讓身體熱起來，達到和用芝麻油按摩讓身體熱起來同樣的效果！
由於實行起來非常簡單，每個人都做得到，也不用花錢，因此由藝人千葉麗子推薦之後， 許多藝人紛紛仿效，成為一股風潮！
先說說喝熱水具備哪些效果吧:
1.促進新陳代謝
喝熱水不僅能夠刺激腸胃蠕動，也能促進腎臟肝臟等器官的活動！
維持擔任排毒重責大任的器官的活性， 讓血液能夠更輕鬆的運輸氧氣與養分到全身，促進新陳代謝！
2.調整味覺
開始喝熱水，會感覺到溫水的甜味！
慢慢的你會對於食物的味道越來越敏銳！
稍微吃一點就會有吃了東西的實感，進而避免暴飲暴食！
3.排出毒素
熱水能夠溫暖內臟器官，促進消化，讓囤積在體內的毒素排出體外！
除了有利尿作用之外，因為體內水分的調節，更能夠改善便秘！
此外也能加速排汗， 達到良好的排毒效果！
4.賦予滿腹飽足感
和一般的水比起來，喝熱水需要花時間一口一口慢慢喝，因此更能夠獲得滿腹感！
在吃飯的時候搭配食物一起喝，更能夠增加飽足感！
5.幫助消化
經常暴飲暴食會影響消化，並讓無法消化的食物開始囤積在體內！
熱水可以刺激胃的蠕動，幫助消化，並幫助囤積的老廢物質順勢排出！
6.沉澱心情
除了身體機能的調整之外，喝熱水也具有精神層面排毒的功效！
慢慢的喝杯熱水，能夠緩衝一下忙碌的工作，消除壓力， 讓你神清氣爽！
根據阿育吠陀(Aayurveda)的說法，
影響人類身體與精神健康的元素可以從風，火，水三種元素來看！
頭痛，肩頸酸痛，失眠，肌膚粗糙，便秘等都是因為火的元素失調的關係，追究原因就是身體“太冷”！
夏天經常吹冷氣，吃冰的東西，內外夾攻，這時候喝熱水就是一種均衡的消化劑！
雖然喝熱水排毒非常簡單，但也不是隨便喝喝就能達到最好的效果喔！
在喝法上還是有些講究的:
1.早上起床喝一杯熱水
早上起床喝一馬克杯的熱水，水溫在不要燙口，能夠順順喝下的溫度最好！
能夠溫熱內臟器官，溶解體內的老廢物質，加速排出！
讓一天有個神清氣爽的開始！
2.一天喝1.2~ 1.5公升的熱水
任何東西過量都不好！雖然喝熱水沒有副作用，但是以為這樣而狂飲的話，反而會造成多餘的水分在體內囤積，新陳代謝惡化，成為寒冷體質，進而容易肥胖！
一天1.2~ 1.5公升的量最適中！
3.一次一點點慢慢喝，不要牛飲
不要在渴的時候咕嘟咕嘟狂飲，最好是每次半杯小口小口慢慢喝！
1~2個小時喝一杯左右的量！不要燙口的熱水，溫熱就可以了！
4.入浴後水分補給
洗完澡後， 喝一杯溫水(和體溫差不多的溫水)，補充流失的水分！
這時候好不容易藉由泡澡讓身體溫熱起來，最好避免喝冰的東西，讓身體冷卻！
經過日本許多明星的實踐證明:
熱水排毒法能夠提升基礎代謝，讓身體覺得輕鬆舒暢，改善便秘，排出老廢物質，進而達到美肌與瘦身的效果！
這種不花錢的健康排毒法，還不趕快試試?！
（以上是轉載的好文章）
2012-02-16
真心新聞網：正覺教育基金會不評論其他宗教性侵事件的原因
http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart/183
（真心新聞網採訪組台北報導）
（真心新聞網採訪組台北報導）
達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長達瓦才仁在12月7日美國自由亞洲電台的新聞訪談中提到：「今天被打擊的是藏傳佛教，也許臺灣政府和社會不當一回事，但將來這股勢力可能轉移到其它物件，慢慢地它將如同癌細胞般蔓延，最終成為不治之症。」
關於此點，正覺教育基金會董事長張公僕先生回應表示，藏傳佛教的男女雙修法，喇嘛不但要與女信徒上床合修雙身法，最後還要許多男女信徒實行多人一起集體輪流性交，具載於達賴喇嘛信奉的宗喀巴著作《密宗道次第廣論》等密續中；證明藏傳佛教的教義明顯違背社會善良風俗與國家法律，不是個案而是教義規定應該如此，具備了邪教的本質。若縱放其繼續弘傳，實質上「它將如同癌細胞般蔓延，最終成為」台灣社會「不治之症」。近年來我們看到了數不勝數的喇嘛性侵女眾的新聞，以及最近又有弘傳密宗的大法師性侵女眾；另一則新聞提到有一名母親因為迷信宗教，竟然要自己兩位未成年女兒跟學密的師兄「雙修」；而這些亂象，都是因為藏傳佛教在台灣興盛的結果，但藏傳佛教密宗的根本教義就是要男女雙修；在教義上是如此，在台灣及全球弘傳藏傳佛教的達賴喇嘛，在書中也不斷地有這樣的說法，例如達賴喇嘛在書中公開說：【對於佛教徒來說，倘若修行者有著堅定的智慧和慈悲，則可以運用性交在修行的道上，因為這可以引發意識的強大專注力，目的是為了要彰顯與延長心更深刻的層面（稍早有關死亡過程時曾描述），為的是要把力量用在強化空性領悟上。否則僅僅只是性交，與心靈修行完全無關。當一個人在動機和智慧上的修行已經達到很高的階段，那麼就算是兩性相交或一般所謂的性交，也不會減損這個人的純淨行為。在修行道上已達到很高程度的瑜伽行者，是完全有資格進行雙修，而具有這樣能力的出家人是可以維持住他的戒律。 】(達賴喇嘛著，丁乃竺譯，《修行的第一堂課》，先覺出版股份有限公司，2003年5月初版7刷，頁177-178。)
達賴喇嘛在書中的看法，認為喇嘛只要程度夠高就可以和女人性交而不屬於犯戒，說只要不射精就是持戒清淨，全然違背釋迦牟尼佛的戒律，還騙人是持戒清淨。不但如此，達賴喇嘛還說性交可以證悟佛法而證果或解脫，所以達賴喇嘛說道：【在無上瑜珈續中，即使是第一步的接受灌頂， 都必須在男性和女性佛交抱的面前成辦。……在這些 男女交合的情況中，如果有一方的證悟比較高， 就能夠促成雙方同時解脫或證果。】（達賴喇嘛文集（3）——達賴喇嘛著，鄭振煌譯，《西藏佛教的修行道》，慧炬出版社，90年3月初一版一刷，56-57頁）但是推究達賴所說的藏傳佛教的解脫與證果，其實都只是凡夫的想像，與佛教中所說的解脫與證果全然無關，所說的雙身法性交修行的解脫與證果，也是公然欺騙世人。
由達賴喇嘛的積極推動，再藉由設立基金會在台推動，邪淫的藏傳佛教雙身法已經在台灣的宗教界泛濫了；因此我們接到許多民眾投訴，藏傳佛教的雙身修法已經蔓延到台灣的佛教寺院中，有不少的出家法師暗中都在修學藏傳佛教密宗，白天穿著顯教法師的袈裟誦經念佛，晚上卻依循著密宗喇嘛的教導，以男女雙修法來性侵女信徒。大家可以看到，有那麼多性侵女眾的醜聞都是來自藏傳佛教的活佛喇嘛仁波切；偶爾有正統佛教的法師出現性侵女信徒之事，也是因為暗中修學藏傳佛教密宗所致。加上達賴喇嘛在多本書中一再提到的男女雙身法，可見藏傳佛教的教義本質就是男女性交雙身法，是教義本身出了問題；這與其他宗教的性侵案例的個案犯罪型態不同，也與其他宗教的弘法師偶爾出現性侵事件的動機是不一樣的；因此我們正覺教育基金會目前和以後，都不準備對其他的宗教性侵案件加以評論，因為那些宗教性侵都跟藏傳佛教仿稱為佛教的事實無關，也跟仿稱為其他宗教的本質無關；既無損於佛教的教義，也無損於其他宗教的善良教義。
然而藏傳佛教的雙修性侵，卻仿稱為佛教及佛法，事實上卻完全不是佛教，竟已被眾生普遍誤以為是佛教界幹的惡事，使得佛教界的出家人蒙羞；所以我們只對於這種假冒佛教的藏傳假佛教加以評論。因為這個假冒佛教的藏傳佛教誤導了眾生，害得原本持戒清淨的顯教法師去學密，結果也走入了男女雙身法，最後淪落到社會新聞版上的頭版頭條，而大家看到了這些喇嘛性侵案件之後，卻又因為被喇嘛教誤導而認為是佛教界的醜事，就把責任推究到佛教身上，說這些都是佛教人士幹的惡事，如此汙衊了佛教的清譽。
張董事長最後表示，希望政府能夠取締這種主張男女性交教義的邪教；而我們也要繼續告訴社會大眾，這種男女雙修的藏傳佛教密宗不是佛教，連一絲絲佛教解脫與證果的內涵都沒有；如果有一天藏傳佛教密宗能夠承認自己不是佛教，而自認為是喇嘛教；社會大眾也都了知喇嘛教不是佛教，也都知道喇嘛的性侵女性實與佛教無關，那麼正覺教育基金會也就不會再評論喇嘛教了；因為已經與佛教無關了，不屬於仿冒的宗教了，已不會傷及佛教正法的弘傳大業。但若他們將來仿冒基督教、回教、道教而不自稱是喇嘛教，並且也繼續性侵女信徒而謊稱精修雙身法可以成為上帝時，本會仍將一本初衷繼續揭露其仿冒宗教的本質。（採訪組報導）20120107
關於此點，正覺教育基金會董事長張公僕先生回應表示，藏傳佛教的男女雙修法，喇嘛不但要與女信徒上床合修雙身法，最後還要許多男女信徒實行多人一起集體輪流性交，具載於達賴喇嘛信奉的宗喀巴著作《密宗道次第廣論》等密續中；證明藏傳佛教的教義明顯違背社會善良風俗與國家法律，不是個案而是教義規定應該如此，具備了邪教的本質。若縱放其繼續弘傳，實質上「它將如同癌細胞般蔓延，最終成為」台灣社會「不治之症」。近年來我們看到了數不勝數的喇嘛性侵女眾的新聞，以及最近又有弘傳密宗的大法師性侵女眾；另一則新聞提到有一名母親因為迷信宗教，竟然要自己兩位未成年女兒跟學密的師兄「雙修」；而這些亂象，都是因為藏傳佛教在台灣興盛的結果，但藏傳佛教密宗的根本教義就是要男女雙修；在教義上是如此，在台灣及全球弘傳藏傳佛教的達賴喇嘛，在書中也不斷地有這樣的說法，例如達賴喇嘛在書中公開說：【對於佛教徒來說，倘若修行者有著堅定的智慧和慈悲，則可以運用性交在修行的道上，因為這可以引發意識的強大專注力，目的是為了要彰顯與延長心更深刻的層面（稍早有關死亡過程時曾描述），為的是要把力量用在強化空性領悟上。否則僅僅只是性交，與心靈修行完全無關。當一個人在動機和智慧上的修行已經達到很高的階段，那麼就算是兩性相交或一般所謂的性交，也不會減損這個人的純淨行為。在修行道上已達到很高程度的瑜伽行者，是完全有資格進行雙修，而具有這樣能力的出家人是可以維持住他的戒律。 】(達賴喇嘛著，丁乃竺譯，《修行的第一堂課》，先覺出版股份有限公司，2003年5月初版7刷，頁177-178。)
達賴喇嘛在書中的看法，認為喇嘛只要程度夠高就可以和女人性交而不屬於犯戒，說只要不射精就是持戒清淨，全然違背釋迦牟尼佛的戒律，還騙人是持戒清淨。不但如此，達賴喇嘛還說性交可以證悟佛法而證果或解脫，所以達賴喇嘛說道：【在無上瑜珈續中，即使是第一步的接受灌頂， 都必須在男性和女性佛交抱的面前成辦。……在這些 男女交合的情況中，如果有一方的證悟比較高， 就能夠促成雙方同時解脫或證果。】（達賴喇嘛文集（3）——達賴喇嘛著，鄭振煌譯，《西藏佛教的修行道》，慧炬出版社，90年3月初一版一刷，56-57頁）但是推究達賴所說的藏傳佛教的解脫與證果，其實都只是凡夫的想像，與佛教中所說的解脫與證果全然無關，所說的雙身法性交修行的解脫與證果，也是公然欺騙世人。
由達賴喇嘛的積極推動，再藉由設立基金會在台推動，邪淫的藏傳佛教雙身法已經在台灣的宗教界泛濫了；因此我們接到許多民眾投訴，藏傳佛教的雙身修法已經蔓延到台灣的佛教寺院中，有不少的出家法師暗中都在修學藏傳佛教密宗，白天穿著顯教法師的袈裟誦經念佛，晚上卻依循著密宗喇嘛的教導，以男女雙修法來性侵女信徒。大家可以看到，有那麼多性侵女眾的醜聞都是來自藏傳佛教的活佛喇嘛仁波切；偶爾有正統佛教的法師出現性侵女信徒之事，也是因為暗中修學藏傳佛教密宗所致。加上達賴喇嘛在多本書中一再提到的男女雙身法，可見藏傳佛教的教義本質就是男女性交雙身法，是教義本身出了問題；這與其他宗教的性侵案例的個案犯罪型態不同，也與其他宗教的弘法師偶爾出現性侵事件的動機是不一樣的；因此我們正覺教育基金會目前和以後，都不準備對其他的宗教性侵案件加以評論，因為那些宗教性侵都跟藏傳佛教仿稱為佛教的事實無關，也跟仿稱為其他宗教的本質無關；既無損於佛教的教義，也無損於其他宗教的善良教義。
然而藏傳佛教的雙修性侵，卻仿稱為佛教及佛法，事實上卻完全不是佛教，竟已被眾生普遍誤以為是佛教界幹的惡事，使得佛教界的出家人蒙羞；所以我們只對於這種假冒佛教的藏傳假佛教加以評論。因為這個假冒佛教的藏傳佛教誤導了眾生，害得原本持戒清淨的顯教法師去學密，結果也走入了男女雙身法，最後淪落到社會新聞版上的頭版頭條，而大家看到了這些喇嘛性侵案件之後，卻又因為被喇嘛教誤導而認為是佛教界的醜事，就把責任推究到佛教身上，說這些都是佛教人士幹的惡事，如此汙衊了佛教的清譽。
張董事長最後表示，希望政府能夠取締這種主張男女性交教義的邪教；而我們也要繼續告訴社會大眾，這種男女雙修的藏傳佛教密宗不是佛教，連一絲絲佛教解脫與證果的內涵都沒有；如果有一天藏傳佛教密宗能夠承認自己不是佛教，而自認為是喇嘛教；社會大眾也都了知喇嘛教不是佛教，也都知道喇嘛的性侵女性實與佛教無關，那麼正覺教育基金會也就不會再評論喇嘛教了；因為已經與佛教無關了，不屬於仿冒的宗教了，已不會傷及佛教正法的弘傳大業。但若他們將來仿冒基督教、回教、道教而不自稱是喇嘛教，並且也繼續性侵女信徒而謊稱精修雙身法可以成為上帝時，本會仍將一本初衷繼續揭露其仿冒宗教的本質。（採訪組報導）20120107
正覺教育基金會採訪組
2012-02-04
（評）蘇格蘭宗教哲學家坎貝爾：我是一個坦特羅密教（藏傳佛教）性奴隸！(June Campbell: I was a Tantric sex slave)
佛教教主釋迦牟尼從來不曾宣說此雙身法。《十誦律》卷50：「有五種施無福：施女人、施戲具、施畫男女合像、施酒、施非法語，是名五無福施。」)
蘇格蘭宗教哲學家坎貝爾：
我是一個坦特羅密教（藏傳佛教）性奴隸
I was a Tantric sex slave
我是一個坦特羅密教（藏傳佛教）性奴隸
I was a Tantric sex slave
總有藏密宗徒說藏密是神聖無上的，藏密真的那麼神聖嗎？就讓我們看看蘇格蘭宗教哲學家 June Campbell 親身經歷吧！藉由她的書，《空行母：尋找藏傳佛教中女性之定位》，蘇格蘭宗教哲學家 June Campbell 打開了許多道讓人可以誠實探討與深入辯論坦特羅密教教義的水閘門。她曾擔任過多名西藏喇嘛的翻譯員，其中還包括了她後來成為其秘密性伴侶的卡盧仁波切。在這裡我們重現了來自英國獨立報 The Independent 有關她的一份訪問報導。
With her book, Traveller in Space: In Search of Female Identity in Tibetan Buddhism, the Scottish philosopher of religion, June Campbell, opened the floodgates for an honest and sound debate about Tantric Buddhism. She worked as a translator for Tibetan lamas, including Kalu Rinpoche, whose "secret sexual consort" she became. Here we reproduce an article about her from The Independent.
英國獨立報-1999年2月10號 - 記者 Paul Vallely
The Independent - 10. February 1999 - Paul Vallely
June Campbell曾經是一位地位崇高的西藏喇嘛的多年性伴侶。她還曾被告知如果違背秘密誓言的話，將遭受死亡詛咒的威脅，但是話說回來，所謂的開悟或許真的脫不了這些事吧?
For years June Campbell was the`consort`of a senior Tibetan Buddhist monk. She was threatened with death if she broke her vow of secrecy. But then enlightenment can be like that.
又是一雙黏土腳嗎？不，是人體解剖構造上的另一部分——而且是再肉質不過的一部分——所造成 的麻煩。當然，我想讀者們應該都不至於會誤認坦特羅密教中的雙修性行為會是一種坦率公開的活動，不過話再說回來，當你立誓出家成為一名禁慾的比丘尼時，任何一種形式的性行為想當初都不在你原先的計劃中吧。(※譯註: 黏土腳: 這個名詞特別用來喻指某些地位崇高，道貌岸然之人，其實暗中有公眾所看不見的弱點或 秘密!意味一個人的地位再神聖，站的再高，如果他的雙腳是黏土作的，那麼將很容易被打碎，打碎了自然就站不穩，必定要從高處跌下來，既不神聖也不高了!)
Feet of clay? No, it was a different part of the anatomy - and of all too fleshly substance - which caused the trouble. But, I suppose, you don`t expect Tantric sex to be a straightforward activity. Then again, sex of any kind isn`t really what you`re planning when you become a celibate nun.
這是，June Campbell 在演講開始時說的，自從她的書出版以來第二次被邀請為這個國家的佛教團體發表演說，《空行母》這本書在三年前問世出版， 而一點也不意外的，她所敘述的主題被當時的宗教界斥為異端，而她所遭受的責難亦可說是無人能過其右。因為在書中她不僅揭露了自己曾是西藏諸多「神聖」修行 人當中，一位轉世喇嘛——卡盧仁波切多年的秘密性伴侶，她還堅信這種關係的核心當中所隱藏的權力濫用更足以暴顯整個坦特羅密教（即喇嘛教）教義最極核心的缺失！
It was, said June Campbell as she began her lecture, only the second time she had been asked to give a talk to a Buddhist group in this country since her book. Traveller in Space came out three years ago. Small wonder. The topic of her talk was "Dissent in Spiritual Communities", and you don`t get much more potent types of dissent than hers. For she not only revealed that she had for years been the secret sexual consort of one of the most holy monks in Tibetan Buddhism - the tulku (re-incarnated lama), Kalu Rinpoche. She also insisted that the abuse of power at the heart of the relationship exposed a flaw at the very heart of Tibetan Buddhism.
說實在的，乍聽之下這真是異端邪說。對外人而言，卡盧仁波切是西藏流亡在外諸多備受崇敬瑜伽師—喇嘛當中的一個。身為自己寺院的住持，他不僅早發誓禁慾，而且更以曾隱居潛修十四年而備享盛名。他的學生當中，很多都是西藏最高階層的喇嘛。而正如 Ms.Campbell 說的：「在西藏社會中，他的身份地位是無庸置疑的，而所有人也都樂於證明他的神聖不凡。」
This was heresy, indeed. To outsiders, the Rinpoche was one of the most revered yogi-lamas in exile outside Tibet. As abbot of his own monastery, he had taken vows of celibacy and was celebrated for having spent 14 years in solitary retreat. Among his students were the highest ranking lamas in Tibet. "His own status, was unquestioned in the Tibetan community", said Ms. Campbell, "and his holiness attested to by all".
藏傳佛教世界這個圈子——不管它在西方時尚圈中已經如何傳播開來——本質上都還是一個既封閉又緊密的圈子。儘管 Ms.Campbell 已經選擇將自己的陳述以一種頗為節制的方式，在她那本極為學術化而又以「尋找藏傳佛教中女 性之定位」為副標題的書中表達出來，仍然不免在這個封閉的圈子中激起被她形容為「憤怒與激動的原始流露」的強烈反彈。「我被痛斥謾罵成一名騙子，一個惡 魔！」她在上個禮拜於 Sharpham，Devon 的無派系佛學研究大學 (the nonsectarian College for Buddhist Studies)所發表的那場公開演講中這樣說：「在西藏佛教那個世界裡，他是一名聖人。而我對他的揭發就好像是宣稱天主教德蕾莎修女也會拍A片一樣！」
The inner circles of the world of Tibetan Buddhism - for all ist spread in fashionable circles in the West - is a closed and tight one. Her claims, though made in a restrained way in the context of a deeply academic book subtitled - "In Search of Female Identity in Tibetan Buddhism" - provoked what she described as a primitive outpouring of rage and fury. "I was reviled as a liar or a demon", she said during a public lecture last week at the nonsectarian College for Buddhist Studies in Sharpham, Devon. "In that world he was a saintly figure. It was like claiming that Mother Teresa was involved in making porn movies".
但是，並非因為不敢面對這些反彈，而讓她整整等了十八年才出版這本書 《Traveller in Space》（Traveller in Space 即藏語 dakini一辭的英譯，dakini 是空行母的意思，這個名辭雖然看似頗有詩意，實則不過意指被邪淫本質的藏傳佛教喇嘛用來當作雙修性工具的女人）來揭發吐露真相。而是整 整花了十八年那麼久的時間，她才終於能夠克服這些經歷所造成的創傷。「有十一年之久我絕口不提這事，等到我決心要把它寫下來了，又花了我七年的時間去做研 究。我想作的是把我個人的經驗以及我對西藏社會中女性所扮演角色的瞭解編織聯繫起來，好讓自己能夠合理解釋過去那些發生在我身上的事。」
But it was not fear of the response which made her wait a full 18 years before publishing her revelations in a volume entitled Traveller in Space - a translation of dakini, the rather poetic Tibetan word for a woman used by a lama for sex. It took her that long to get over the trauma of the experience. "I spent 11 years without talking about it and then, when I had decided to write about it, another seven years researching. I wanted to weave together my personal experience with a more theoretical understanding of the role of women in Tibetan society to help me make sense of what had happened to me."
事情發生經過如下，六零年間嬉皮年代當 June Campbell 在蘇格蘭家鄉成為佛教徒後， 她接著就旅行到印度並在那裡出家成為比丘尼。隨後她又在一座西藏喇 嘛寺廟裡待了十年，遠比任何一位西方人士都還深入接近這個信仰中的神秘高層。最後她更成為藏密大師卡盧仁波切七十年代旅遊歐美時的隨身翻譯。「就是在那之 後，」Campbell 說，「卡盧仁波切要求我成為他的性伴侶，與他雙身共修密法。」
（版主按：藏傳佛教的地位崇高的卡盧仁波切，這老色狼覬覦了十年才對她下手，可見一般修學密宗的女性，難以從初期就察覺喇嘛上師的異狀。最好的保身之道就是遇到喇嘛教的信徒即以三不政策對治：不接觸、不相信、不妥協。）
What happened was that , having become a Buddhist in her native Scotland in the hippie Sixties, she travelled to India where she became a nun. She spent 10 years in a Tibetan monastery and penetrated more deeply than any other Westerner into the faith`s esoteric hierarchy. Eventually she became personal translator to the guru as, during the Seventies, he travelled through Europe and America. It was after that, she said, that "he requested that I become his sexual consort and take part in secret activities with him".What happened was that, having become a Buddhist in her native Scotland in the hippie Sixties, she travelled to India where she became a nun. She spent 10 years in a Tibetan monastery and penetrated more deeply than any other Westerner into the faith`s esoteric hierarchy. Eventually she became personal translator to the guru as, during the Seventies, he travelled through Europe and America. It was after that, she said, that "he requested that I become his sexual consort and take part in secret activities with him".
只有一個第三者知道她與卡盧仁波切間的這種關係——一個侍從喇嘛——這個喇嘛也曾在 Campbell 所形容並參與的那種一女多男西藏密宗雙身共修關係中與她發生過性行為。「好幾年過後，我才醒悟到就 我當時所被侵犯與利用到的程度來說，那早已構成是一種對性的剝削與糟蹋了。就年代上來說，坦特羅密教這種雙身修法要比正統佛教(顯教)還來的早。
Only one other person knew of the relationship - a second monk - with whom she took part in what she described as a polyandrous Tibetanstyle relationship. "It was some years before I realised that the extent to which I had been taken advantage of constituted a kind of abuse".
而這種思想的來源則 可遠溯自古代印度教某些教徒所深信的——「在交媾當中男性若能保持精液不漏失，就能增強性愛快感並且延年益壽」。藏傳佛教(喇嘛教)以此為基礎，甚至更進 一步發展成深信「若將情慾導入修行當中，而非一味排斥情慾」，將可以讓修行人加速到達所謂開悟的境界！這種將情慾導入修行中的方法，在藏傳佛教中被視為極 端危險而又極端有效，可以讓修行人有機會在短短的一世中證悟成道，即身成佛。
The practice of Tantric sex is more ancient than Buddhism. The idea goes back to the ancient Hindus who believed that the retention of semen during intercourse increased sexual pleasure and made men live longer. The Tibetan Buddhists developed the belief that enlightenment could be accelerated by the decision "to enlist the passions in one`s religious practice, rather than to avoid them". The stategy is considered extremely risky yet so efficacious that it could lead to enligthenment in one lifetime.
（版主按：事實上男女雙身法是不可能修成佛的！本師釋迦牟尼佛從來都未曾以此邪淫之外道法，說是佛法、是可以修行成就之法。不唯如此，佛陀還在經律中教誡大眾要遠離淫欲因緣，莫在寺廟裏擺設以男女交合之像（請參考舉證）。因為佛陀時代，婆羅門性力派外道就是以此種男女交合相作為修行，如今，此邪淫本質之外道法滲透到佛門之中，欲入篡正統，以自創「金剛乘」凌駕於大乘佛法之上，此乃末法亂像，眾生福薄、煩惱粗重，才會信受此法，去購買藏傳佛教之男女交合相雙身唐卡，將之高懸於堂廟之上，與清淨之佛菩薩並列，是殊乃可嘆也！
舉證１、《十誦律》卷50：「有五種施無福：施女人、施戲具、施畫男女合像、施酒、施非法語，是名五無福施。」(CBETA, T23, no. 1435, p. 363, b22-24)
略釋：佛說有五種布施是沒有福報可言的。一、布施女人供人淫欲、買春或修「雙身法」之用。二、布施遊戲嬉戲之器具。三、布施男女交合的畫像或雕像。四、布施酒。五、布施教人偷騙搶拐、淫人妻女、雙修成「佛」之言語文字方法等。
舉證２、《十誦律》卷48：「佛聽我畫柱塔上者善？佛言：除男女合像。餘者聽作。」(CBETA, T23, no. 1435, p. 352, a3-6)
略釋：佛陀允許我在寺廟裏的柱子上作畫好嗎？佛說：除了不允許畫男女交合之像，其餘畫什麼都允許。
舉證３、《四分律行事鈔簡正記》卷16：「房舍法中。不得作男女合像。」(CBETA, X43, no. 737, p. 429, c2 // Z 1:68, p. 484, b8 // R68, p. 967, b8)
略釋：出家人居住的房舍裏，不得有製作男女交合的畫像及雕像。）
資歷淺地位低的喇嘛因為有所受限而只能在冥想當中以觀想的方式進行這種男女雙身修法，但是正如 Campbell 書中所陳述的，那些號稱「大師」的高層喇嘛則自認已經達到能夠進行真正的男女合體雙修而不被情慾污染的境界，在西藏所謂的密續 (※譯註: 特指密宗喇嘛自創的經典，與顯教經論不同) 中，詳細地解說了這些號稱可以控制男性精液能量流動的瑜珈呼吸控制法與其它修行 法。所有這些方法的主要目的不外乎「將精液能量 (※譯註: 意為陽性或男性能量，就外在而言，即表現為男性物質精液。一般人但依常識亦知不可能將精液轉移至 脊柱乃至頭部中!) 沿著脊柱往上引導到頭部」。一位修行者如果累積越多的男性能量在頭部，就越被視為在智能與心靈上越優秀強壯。
Monks of a lower status confined themselves to visualising an imaginary sexual relationship during meditation. But, her book sets out, the "masters" reach a point where they decide that they can engage in sex without being tainted by it. The instructions in the so-called "secret" texts spell out the methods which enable the man to control the flow of semen through yogic breath control and other practices. The idea is to "drive the semen upwards, along the spine, and into the head". The more semen in a man`s head, the stronger intellectually and spiritually he is thought to be.
「『一般性行為的倒行逆施』恰足以一語道破密宗雙身修法中男女雙方的相對關係與地位。」
"The reverse of ordinary sex expresses the relative status of the male and female within the ritual."
此外,在保持自己精液不漏失的情況下，男性甚至還可以藉由吸取雙修女伴的淫液而獲得額外的精氣能量。這種「一般性行為的倒行逆施」，June Campbell 說：「正足以說明雙身儀軌中男女雙方的相對關係地位，因為它清楚表明力量是從女方身上流失到男方的。」(※譯註: 之所以稱為「一般性行為的倒行逆施」是因為在一般性行為當中，男方最終必將射精漏失精液，亦即所謂損失精氣能量！然而密宗雙身修法卻「倒行逆施」，標榜精液可以不漏失，甚至還能反向逆引此一男性精液能量上傳至頭部！)
More than that, he is said to gain additional strength from absorbing he woman`s sexual fluids at the same time as withholding his own. This "reverse of ordinary sex", said June Campbell, "expresses the relative status of the male and female within the ritual, for it signals the power flowing from the woman to the man".
（版主按：這些「倒行逆施」的理論完全不符合人體功能，亦非聖者身體之現象。因為這些性行為，不論有沒有射精，乃至回收到膀胱裏，只要是有性行為的發生，就會耗損人體的能量元氣，更何況密宗雙修長時間與女明妃交媾，所耗之能量元氣更甚拍A片之淫男淫女。除非雙修喇嘛能因雙修後而停止飲食，即表示其能量元氣不失，但我們卻觀察到密宗喇嘛長年大量食用牛羊肉食又飲酒，足以可見雙修洩與不洩都會大量耗損身體能量，不然為何雙修後還要睡覺吃東西呢？
反而是節欲斷欲寡欲之人，由於減少能量之耗損，心地清淨，身體輕爽，自然可以減少食量，以素食為主，日中一食乃至數日方進一食，遑論如密宗開葷吃肉？例如土城廣欽老和尚入定三個月不食一滴一粒米，虛雲老和尚數日僅吃野草即可維生，身體輕飄，還可以草上飛，古今中外之雙修喇嘛誰能如此？）
這種雙修法中男女地位的失衡是因為喇嘛大師們必定會堅持與他們進行雙修的「空行母」嚴守秘密——其目的不過在於讓喇嘛們可以完全掌握這些雙修的女伴—— 而更形惡化。June Campbell 說：「這本書出版以來，我收到不少從世界各地曾遭受相同甚至更惡劣待遇的女性所寄來的信件。」
The imbalance is underscored by the insistence by such guru-lamas that their sexual consorts must remain secret, allowing the lamas to maintain control over the women. "Since the book was published, I`ve had letters from women all over the world with similar and worse experiences".
那麼到底是什麼原因讓她繼續待在卡盧仁波切身旁將近三年之久呢?「個人的威望與地位！」這些與喇嘛上師進行雙修的女性相信她們自己是特別而且是神聖的！ (※譯註: 因為只有她們能與「神聖尊貴」的喇嘛上師們進行秘密雙修，別的女人不能!) 她們相信自己正踏入一個神聖的領域。這種神聖領域的踏入將為自己的來世帶來好運，而為了踏入這個神聖領域而與喇嘛上師們裸體進行雙修則是對自己信仰忠誠與否的一種考驗！這種宗教信仰、性、權力與秘密的混合能夠產生一種威力龐大的效應。結果正是造成一種讓人進退兩難的精神勒索情況，恰如另一個西藏喇嘛 Beru Kyhentze Rinpoch 所說的:「如果你自己上師的舉止看起來不像一個覺悟者應有的行為，而你又覺得在這種情形下把他視為是一尊佛實在是很假道學的話，那麼你應該記住你自己的想法是不足憑恃的，而你所看到自己上師所犯的 那些明顯過失很可能正是你自己紊亂不過的心靈所顯現的倒影罷了……(要知道)如果你的上師以一種完美的狀態表現舉止時，他對你而言將成為遙不可及，而你也 將無法與他親近乃至溝通。所以啊，你的上師之所以表現出種種明顯過失其實是出於大慈悲心……他其實是在為你顯現你自己的過失啊！」
So why did she stay for almost three years? "Personal prestige. The women believe that they too are special and holy. They are entering sacred space. It produces good karma for future lives, an is a test of faith". The combination of religion, sex, power and secrecy can have a potent effect. It creates the Catch 22 of psychological blackmail set out in the words of another lama, Beru Kyhentze Rinpoche: "If your guru acts in a seemingly unenlightened manner and you feel it would be hypocritical to think him a Buddha, you should remember that your own opinions are unreliable and the apparent faults you see may only be a reflection of your own deluded state of mind...If your guru acted in a completely perfect manner he would be inaccessible and you would be able to relate to him. It is therefore out of your Guru`s great compassion that he may show apparent flaws... He ist mirroring your own faults".
這種精神壓力對於那些「空行母」來說,通常因為她們必須發下毒誓保證決不洩漏與上師裸體雙修的秘密而隨之加強，就 June Campbell 而言，她就曾被告知如果違誓洩漏她與上師進行裸體雙修的秘密的話，「瘋狂，災難甚至死亡」將可能隨之降臨於她身上！「我被告知說，與我進行雙修的卡盧仁波切，在上一輩子裡有個情婦帶給他一些麻煩，為了除掉她，他就唸咒施術讓那位情婦生病乃至最後病重死亡！」
The psychological pressure ist often increased by making the woman swear vows of secrecy. In addition June Campbell was told that "madness, trouble or even death" could follow if she did not keep silent. "I was told that in a previous life the lama I was involved with had had a mistress who caused him some trouble, and in order to get rid of her he cast a spell which caused her illness later resulting in her death."（版主按：全世界的社會新聞中，那些被色狼性侵的女子女童大多都被加害者恐嚇：若報警或告知父母，就把妳或妳家人殺死！手段如出一轍。密宗色狼亦是如此，希望社會大眾小心僅慎以免自己及家人受害。）
「當我開始解開自己舊心結的同時，我也開始質疑起了一切事。」 她說。這兩句話的意思是，她所懷疑的對象已不僅僅是某位喇嘛上師的行為是否正確？而是更進一步的，他的法義思想是否根本就是有問題？她更開始懷疑起整個坦特羅密教的思想或許根本不過就是個大妄想，而密教無上瑜珈中的男女雙修根本也就跟一般男女的裸體作愛毫無兩樣！她甚至還懷疑起所謂的覺悟到底是否存在？而 靜坐冥想那些修行是否有真實意義？「我體認到如果我真的想要重新尋回自我的話，我一定得完全地、徹底地拋開以前所有的那一切！」
"Once I started unravelling my experiences, I began to question everything," she said. That meant not just the actions of a particular guru, but the very idea of the guru. She began to wonder whether the Tantra was just a fantasy, and whether there is really any difference between Tantric sex and ordinary sex. She questioned the very concept of enlightenment itself and the practice of meditation. "I realised that in order to be myself I had to leave it all - completely and utterly."
[The original texts from The Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/i-was-a-tantric-sex-slave-1069859.html]
2012-02-01
The "Cultivation Groundwork" of Tibetan "Buddhism"
(By the True Heart News interviewing team in Taipei)
Is Tibetan “Buddhism” a true Buddhist religion or not?
Do the lamas of Tibetan Tantric “Buddhism” really commit money frauds and sexual assaults?
After the True Enlightenment Education Foundation launched a full swing campaign of “Protecting Taiwan’s Women” in four of the most prestigious national newspapers, the issue of “lamas sexually abusing women” has once again been ignited. Taiwanese people have the right to know the answers to the following questions: “Is Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ really a religion that advocates sex? Is Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ a real Buddhist religion or not?”
Dawa Tsering, Director of the Religious Foundation of H.H. the Dalai Lama not only explains unclearly all along, but also avoids answering the questions by blurring the focus. On one hand, he states that the Couple-Practice Tantra does exist in Tibetan “Buddhism”; on the other hand, he denies that the lamas would actually practice this root doctrine of Tibetan “Buddhism.” This creates more confusion and outsiders can never figure out whether these exiled lamas from Tibet really follow the tantras and actually “practice” the sexual method of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism propagated by the Dalai Lama or not.
Dawa Tsering, Director of the Religious Foundation of H.H. the Dalai Lama only beats around the bush to all the queries. This dodging mentality actually matches the response Tibetan “Buddhism” usually gave to the Taiwan society in regard to the sexual assault cases committed by the lamas. The more they try to cover up the truth, the more it will be known to the public!
Zhang Gongpu, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation explains the cultivation method of “attaining Buddhahood in a lifetime” in Tibetan Tantrism. Prior to practicing the “Highest Yoga Tantra to attain Buddhahood in a lifetime,” Tantric lamas would follow the instructions of Kalachakra Tantra and other kinds of tantras to perform various empowerment rituals as “cultivation groundwork.” The empowerment consists of two parts: the “causal empowerment” and the “path empowerment.” The causal empowerment is usually called the water empowerment, which can be done through making offerings and visualization. The path empowerment includes vase, secret, wisdom, and the fourth empowerment.
CEO Zhang points out that there are various kinds of empowerment rituals, and each ritual is interpreted differently within different sects of Tibetan “Buddhism.” Take the “water empowerment” and the “vase empowerment” for example, they have been performed in generation stage for practicing the “Highest Yoga Tantra.” The water empowerment is essentially derived from the so-called “vajra fluids” of Hindu Tantra. The fluid here actually refers to the male semen. As for the vase empowerment, the female practitioner serves as a vase to receive the guru’s semen from his “vajra way” (genitals). After the transmission of such secret empowerments from guru to disciple, they can then undertake the follow-up empowerment rituals.
CEO Zhang explains, after practitioners have received the secret empowerment, they should follow the guru to practice the copulation tantra with members of the opposite sex for the rest of their lives. Tantric learners are supposed to regularly and frequently practice with any fellow practitioners of the opposite sex. During the secret empowerment, there can be even up to nine physical female consorts at the same time. (In the case of female gurus presiding over the secret empowerments, the consorts are then male ones.)
Such shameless promiscuous multi-partner orgies among gurus and disciples cannot possibly be “cultivation” for anyone. Such deeds can only be described as “licentious”! Tibetan Tantrism should be recognized as counterfeit Buddhism, an evil-maker, which corrupts the decency and integrity of unsuspecting spiritual seekers and undermines their families. Succinctly, this is a more accurate description.
Most people, including novices of Tibetan Tantrism who have just received the welcome empowerment and have yet to undertake the secret empowerment, have never heard of these erotic doctrines before. Nonetheless, those doctrines can be easily found in the Tibetan Tantrism related books in general bookstores, and the Dalai Lama openly continues such teachings in his recently published books.
Those who intend to learn the Buddha dharma and wish to establish some preliminary understanding of the cultivation practices of Tibetan counterfeit “Buddhism” should take a look at the statues of deities with consorts, found in Tibetan thangkas, altar, and temples. Then ponder the question, “Why would having sex and wallowing in gross greed of the desire-realm be deemed ‘the way of practice’ in Tibetan ‘Buddhism’?” Afterwards, they should use good judgment and head in the direction of seeking to understand the real doctrinal connotations of the three-vehicle bodhi of orthodox Buddhism.
The fundamental doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” are entirely different from those of orthodox Buddhism. After in-depth comparison, one will realize what the truth is and be immune to the over exaggerated and unsubstantiated lies of Tibetan “Buddhism” and hopefully, women will be able to escape being coerced or seduced into sexual intercourse by lamas. From corroborative evidence one can see clearly that Tibetan “Buddhism” is merely counterfeit Buddhism. (Reported by the interviewing team)
Editor’s Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on July 28, 2011.
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/23
Is Tibetan “Buddhism” a true Buddhist religion or not?
Do the lamas of Tibetan Tantric “Buddhism” really commit money frauds and sexual assaults?
After the True Enlightenment Education Foundation launched a full swing campaign of “Protecting Taiwan’s Women” in four of the most prestigious national newspapers, the issue of “lamas sexually abusing women” has once again been ignited. Taiwanese people have the right to know the answers to the following questions: “Is Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ really a religion that advocates sex? Is Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ a real Buddhist religion or not?”
Dawa Tsering, Director of the Religious Foundation of H.H. the Dalai Lama not only explains unclearly all along, but also avoids answering the questions by blurring the focus. On one hand, he states that the Couple-Practice Tantra does exist in Tibetan “Buddhism”; on the other hand, he denies that the lamas would actually practice this root doctrine of Tibetan “Buddhism.” This creates more confusion and outsiders can never figure out whether these exiled lamas from Tibet really follow the tantras and actually “practice” the sexual method of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism propagated by the Dalai Lama or not.
Dawa Tsering, Director of the Religious Foundation of H.H. the Dalai Lama only beats around the bush to all the queries. This dodging mentality actually matches the response Tibetan “Buddhism” usually gave to the Taiwan society in regard to the sexual assault cases committed by the lamas. The more they try to cover up the truth, the more it will be known to the public!
Zhang Gongpu, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation explains the cultivation method of “attaining Buddhahood in a lifetime” in Tibetan Tantrism. Prior to practicing the “Highest Yoga Tantra to attain Buddhahood in a lifetime,” Tantric lamas would follow the instructions of Kalachakra Tantra and other kinds of tantras to perform various empowerment rituals as “cultivation groundwork.” The empowerment consists of two parts: the “causal empowerment” and the “path empowerment.” The causal empowerment is usually called the water empowerment, which can be done through making offerings and visualization. The path empowerment includes vase, secret, wisdom, and the fourth empowerment.
CEO Zhang points out that there are various kinds of empowerment rituals, and each ritual is interpreted differently within different sects of Tibetan “Buddhism.” Take the “water empowerment” and the “vase empowerment” for example, they have been performed in generation stage for practicing the “Highest Yoga Tantra.” The water empowerment is essentially derived from the so-called “vajra fluids” of Hindu Tantra. The fluid here actually refers to the male semen. As for the vase empowerment, the female practitioner serves as a vase to receive the guru’s semen from his “vajra way” (genitals). After the transmission of such secret empowerments from guru to disciple, they can then undertake the follow-up empowerment rituals.
CEO Zhang explains, after practitioners have received the secret empowerment, they should follow the guru to practice the copulation tantra with members of the opposite sex for the rest of their lives. Tantric learners are supposed to regularly and frequently practice with any fellow practitioners of the opposite sex. During the secret empowerment, there can be even up to nine physical female consorts at the same time. (In the case of female gurus presiding over the secret empowerments, the consorts are then male ones.)
Such shameless promiscuous multi-partner orgies among gurus and disciples cannot possibly be “cultivation” for anyone. Such deeds can only be described as “licentious”! Tibetan Tantrism should be recognized as counterfeit Buddhism, an evil-maker, which corrupts the decency and integrity of unsuspecting spiritual seekers and undermines their families. Succinctly, this is a more accurate description.
Most people, including novices of Tibetan Tantrism who have just received the welcome empowerment and have yet to undertake the secret empowerment, have never heard of these erotic doctrines before. Nonetheless, those doctrines can be easily found in the Tibetan Tantrism related books in general bookstores, and the Dalai Lama openly continues such teachings in his recently published books.
Those who intend to learn the Buddha dharma and wish to establish some preliminary understanding of the cultivation practices of Tibetan counterfeit “Buddhism” should take a look at the statues of deities with consorts, found in Tibetan thangkas, altar, and temples. Then ponder the question, “Why would having sex and wallowing in gross greed of the desire-realm be deemed ‘the way of practice’ in Tibetan ‘Buddhism’?” Afterwards, they should use good judgment and head in the direction of seeking to understand the real doctrinal connotations of the three-vehicle bodhi of orthodox Buddhism.
The fundamental doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” are entirely different from those of orthodox Buddhism. After in-depth comparison, one will realize what the truth is and be immune to the over exaggerated and unsubstantiated lies of Tibetan “Buddhism” and hopefully, women will be able to escape being coerced or seduced into sexual intercourse by lamas. From corroborative evidence one can see clearly that Tibetan “Buddhism” is merely counterfeit Buddhism. (Reported by the interviewing team)
Editor’s Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on July 28, 2011.
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/23
2012-01-25
2012-01-24
[動畫影片] 釋迦牟尼佛傳
釋迦牟尼佛一生的傳記是祂在娑婆世界的一個示現
祂不捨眾生 迴入娑婆示現八相成道
主要也是要讓眾生了解人生有八苦與其解脫方法
以及讓我們知道修身體上的苦行是不能得到解脫的
『天上天下 唯「我」獨尊』
這個「我」是眾生皆有之如來藏本心
但是被貪、瞋、癡、慢、疑，種種邪見遮覆而不得瞭其心
之後，悉達多太子在菩提樹下自行證道，如實知如實見
接著，釋迦佛開始宣說妙法，如何離開生死輪迴的方法 (如何得解脫)...
雖然已經瞭解 釋迦牟尼佛的一生證道
但釋迦傳記再多看幾遍也都會覺得感動！
祂不捨眾生 迴入娑婆示現八相成道
主要也是要讓眾生了解人生有八苦與其解脫方法
以及讓我們知道修身體上的苦行是不能得到解脫的
『天上天下 唯「我」獨尊』
這個「我」是眾生皆有之如來藏本心
但是被貪、瞋、癡、慢、疑，種種邪見遮覆而不得瞭其心
之後，悉達多太子在菩提樹下自行證道，如實知如實見
接著，釋迦佛開始宣說妙法，如何離開生死輪迴的方法 (如何得解脫)...
雖然已經瞭解 釋迦牟尼佛的一生證道
但釋迦傳記再多看幾遍也都會覺得感動！
南無 本師釋迦牟尼佛
南無 本師釋迦牟尼佛
南無 本師釋迦牟尼佛
2011-12-28
Lamas Commonly Indulge in Sexual Desires; Their Excuse is a Blatant Lie
(By Yuyue Lin of the True Heart News interviewing team in Taipei) "Cowboy" Lama Naimai Rinpoche was caught for buying sex as reported in full details by many newspapers and TV channels earlier. Recently, internet media even made more follow-up interviews on this incident and has drawn wide attention from the public. According to the investigation of media reporters, Naimai Rinpoche lived on the seventh floor of a building on Linsen North Road in Taipei City. His apartment also served as a “Buddha” hall with no signs posted. Neighbors nearby were not at all surprised with the rinpoche being caught for buying sex when police conducted a spot check. They said that it was a “common sight.” Neighbors have often seen Naimai Rinpoche come home with female companions, which has left them with bad impressions.
As reporters described, Naimai Rinpoche, who often speciously preached “Buddha dharmas” in front of his followers, dressed in monk’s robe, holding the vajra bell and giving guidance to followers about how to practice self-cultivation according to the Buddha dharma, has in fact violated the gravest monastic precept: sexual abstinence. Moreover, he used the money donated by his followers to buy sex. His behavior has constituted an act of complete crime: the motive, an actual deed and consequence. A TV reporter went to Naimai Rinpoche's apartment for an in-depth interview and recorded the following dialogue:
Residents in the building: "He just came here to swindle people."
Reporter: "A swindler?"
Residents in the building: "Yeah, to coax women into sexual intercourse, plain and simple.”
And then added: "A common sight! A common sight! Exactly that, got it?"
Just as Zhang Gongpu, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, has predicted, the initial step Tibetan “Buddhism” took from their already established procedure is to deny the whole issue to evade public pressure. The police found that Naimai Rinpoche holds a resident permit in Taiwan. His residence is registered as in a Buddhist Institute in Taipei City, where he regularly preaches the "Buddhist sutras" to his followers. His resident permit will expire in mid-August this year. However, someone on behalf of this Buddhist Institute had denied the existence of such a rinpoche and claimed that it must have been another person with the same name. Tibetan Buddhists have set up numerous "Buddhist Institutes" throughout Taiwan. These institutes felt ashamed and had to talk incoherently to deny any of their links with this lama in trouble. If “there is no existence of such a rinpoche," why would they claim that “it is another person with the same name"? This is indeed "the typical lama’s version" of "a blatant lie."
In fact, this Naimai Rinpoche is not any unknown little lama, but is believed to be a grand living “Buddha” of an impressive background. He is also a fully qualified abbot of a monastery. He has been very active in "dharma preaching" in Taiwan, not only presiding over seminars everywhere to publicize the "Dharma Lineage of Lotus Born," but also accepting learners as his disciples. He is honored as the "noble guru" and "mentor of the Buddhist Institute." He even sells his mantra-CD on the internet. A real "supreme venerable" and socially slick lama!
Reference material shows that Naimai Rinpoche (a foreign lama named Naimai and entitled Rinpoche in Taiwan, who has been a mentor and preacher at Dzogchen Buddhist Institute, and it cannot be someone else) was born in 1973 in Xikang Province, China. He was certified by Dzogchen Pema Kalsang Rinpoche as the embodiment of Khenchen Noyang Rinpoche--Nu Chen Sangjie Yeshe (one of the twenty-five great disciples who had attained enlightenment under the Lotus Born) in his previous life. Over the years, Naimai Rinpoche had been trained to become the great Khenpo (abbot) at Dzogchen Monastery, the most prominent temple in Tibet. He began his study at the age of 8 and became a novice lama in Dzogchen Monastery at the age of 11. Between the age of 15 and 26, he studied at Shira Shing Scripture College established by Dzogchen Monastery in 1848. In this institute, he studied all dharmas of Exoteric Buddhism and Tibetan “Buddhism” as well as the five major and minor Treatises of Tibetan Buddhist Doctrine. He was trained under guidance of more than 50 Khenpos and Rinpoches with great achievements. He also participated in rite and retreat activities, practiced Nadis (channels) and studied the core essence of Great Perfection. He then graduated with the highest honor from this College. Naimai Rinpoche has nearly one thousand disciples. Being the chief Khempo of the Dzogchen Shira Shing Scripture College, he even served as the mentor of the Dzogchen Buddhist Institute in Taiwan, which is sponsored by Dzogchen Monastery, one of the six great monasteries of Nyingma tradition of Tibetan "Buddhism."
Regarding the “Dzogchen Monastery,” Gongpu Zhang, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, reminds the readers that the public may still have some recollection of a full swing campaign run by the Foundation on the issue of protecting Taiwan women in the newspapers at the beginning of this year. The Foundation denounced that Linla Rinpoche, who sexually assaulted a nun in 2006, belongs to the monastery mentioned above. Naimai Rinpoche, who had sex with a prostitute, also came from the same monastery, and graduated from the same Buddhist Institute. Both of them are fellow members of the same school, and hold the title of reincarnated living “Buddha” as well as the identity of an Abbot Khenpo. They are even regarded as the “great lamas” of Dzogchen Monastery, which belongs to the Nyingma sect. Their code of practice is in accord with the provisions of “The Six Yogas of Naropa,” which was introduced to Tibet and taught by their immoral patriarchs, Naropa and Padmasambhava. In these provisions, the criterion for selecting copulating partners, the so-called “female consorts” or “Dakinis,” is not based on beauty, but only on the female genitals, that is, whether the female genitals will enable the lamas to attain sexual pleasure during the copulation practice. Therefore, all the lamas are “required to travel around the world to search for ‘distinctive’ women; the qualified female consorts must possess distinctive sexual power.” (The Six Yogas of Naropa, narrated by Blo-Bzan-Grags-Pa Zam Lam, recorded by Lu Yizhao, first edition, Morning Sunshine Culture Press, Aug. 1994, pp. 205-206). Hence, when Naimai Rinpoche claimed his innocence by saying that he is simply “studying the local customs of Taiwan," he was actually trying to look for “women with distinctive sexual power.” Their words and deeds are not surprising to us at all as it totally complies with the provisions of Tibetan “Buddhism.”
As for the issue of “violating the monastic precepts,” the CEO believes that the sin of illicit sex does not exist within Tibetan “Buddhism” because they have developed their own “samaya precepts” besides the precepts of orthodox Buddhism in order to practice the copulation tantra. They believe that “samaya precepts” surpass all Buddhist precepts. Tibetan Tantric samaya precepts even require the practitioners to practice the copulation practice with female followers frequently. For them, engaging in illicit sex according to the copulation tantra is not regarded as violating precepts, but instead, it is believed to have great merits. In other words, tantric lamas have their own interpretation on the sin of illicit sex, which is defined differently from that of orthodox Buddhism. According to the definition by Tibetan “Buddhism,” the precept of no sexual misconduct is violated only when the tantric practitioners ejaculate during sexual intercourse. Having sex with female followers is not considered as breaking the precept. Keeping the pure precept in orthodox Buddhism is not to have sex with women, but for tantric practitioners it refers to no ejaculation during sexual intercourse. The public generally regard that any monk who goes whoring is committing the crime of sexual misconduct. But the fundamental tenets of Tibetan “Buddhism” denote that such a sexual act is for practicing the “Buddha dharma” of the Highest Yoga Tantra. They even consider themselves dutifully endeavoring in cultivation. What could the decent Taiwanese do about it since the Couple-Practice Tantra is indeed the fundamental doctrine of Tibetan “Buddhism”?
Moreover, in some sects of Tibetan “Buddhism,” male practitioners who have received the secret empowerments are even allowed to have their mothers and daughters, sisters or adolescent girls as their copulating partners. Those practitioners are not considered to have violated the precept of no sexual misconduct, but are seen as those who keep the pure precept in Tibetan “Buddhism.” Furthermore, even female animals, corpses or ghosts can be regarded as the copulating partners like “Dakinis” or “Yoginis” and be used for sexual intercourse. Hence, it would not be surprising to learn that Naimai Rinpoche took the money offered by his followers to buy sex, nor will he be seen as violating the precepts. CEO Zhang points out that no wonder the director of the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Dawa Tsering, in a BCC News Network interviewed by correspondent Yujiao Huang, said that the notion of Confucian ethics hinders the propagation of Tibetan “Buddhism.” Therefore, from the viewpoint of “Confucian ethics,” lamas’ promiscuous conduct has already violated good social customs as well as sexual morality and is devoid of humanity. Unfortunately, it has long been a “common occurrence” amongst the lamas of Tibetan “Buddhism.” (Reported by Yuyue Lin) 20111222
Editor's Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on March 7, 2011.
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/21
Please refer to the related article published on Sep. 19, 2011: The Spiritual Mentors Whom Everyone Worships by Day Become Whoremongers at Night
As reporters described, Naimai Rinpoche, who often speciously preached “Buddha dharmas” in front of his followers, dressed in monk’s robe, holding the vajra bell and giving guidance to followers about how to practice self-cultivation according to the Buddha dharma, has in fact violated the gravest monastic precept: sexual abstinence. Moreover, he used the money donated by his followers to buy sex. His behavior has constituted an act of complete crime: the motive, an actual deed and consequence. A TV reporter went to Naimai Rinpoche's apartment for an in-depth interview and recorded the following dialogue:
Residents in the building: "He just came here to swindle people."
Reporter: "A swindler?"
Residents in the building: "Yeah, to coax women into sexual intercourse, plain and simple.”
And then added: "A common sight! A common sight! Exactly that, got it?"
Just as Zhang Gongpu, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, has predicted, the initial step Tibetan “Buddhism” took from their already established procedure is to deny the whole issue to evade public pressure. The police found that Naimai Rinpoche holds a resident permit in Taiwan. His residence is registered as in a Buddhist Institute in Taipei City, where he regularly preaches the "Buddhist sutras" to his followers. His resident permit will expire in mid-August this year. However, someone on behalf of this Buddhist Institute had denied the existence of such a rinpoche and claimed that it must have been another person with the same name. Tibetan Buddhists have set up numerous "Buddhist Institutes" throughout Taiwan. These institutes felt ashamed and had to talk incoherently to deny any of their links with this lama in trouble. If “there is no existence of such a rinpoche," why would they claim that “it is another person with the same name"? This is indeed "the typical lama’s version" of "a blatant lie."
In fact, this Naimai Rinpoche is not any unknown little lama, but is believed to be a grand living “Buddha” of an impressive background. He is also a fully qualified abbot of a monastery. He has been very active in "dharma preaching" in Taiwan, not only presiding over seminars everywhere to publicize the "Dharma Lineage of Lotus Born," but also accepting learners as his disciples. He is honored as the "noble guru" and "mentor of the Buddhist Institute." He even sells his mantra-CD on the internet. A real "supreme venerable" and socially slick lama!
Reference material shows that Naimai Rinpoche (a foreign lama named Naimai and entitled Rinpoche in Taiwan, who has been a mentor and preacher at Dzogchen Buddhist Institute, and it cannot be someone else) was born in 1973 in Xikang Province, China. He was certified by Dzogchen Pema Kalsang Rinpoche as the embodiment of Khenchen Noyang Rinpoche--Nu Chen Sangjie Yeshe (one of the twenty-five great disciples who had attained enlightenment under the Lotus Born) in his previous life. Over the years, Naimai Rinpoche had been trained to become the great Khenpo (abbot) at Dzogchen Monastery, the most prominent temple in Tibet. He began his study at the age of 8 and became a novice lama in Dzogchen Monastery at the age of 11. Between the age of 15 and 26, he studied at Shira Shing Scripture College established by Dzogchen Monastery in 1848. In this institute, he studied all dharmas of Exoteric Buddhism and Tibetan “Buddhism” as well as the five major and minor Treatises of Tibetan Buddhist Doctrine. He was trained under guidance of more than 50 Khenpos and Rinpoches with great achievements. He also participated in rite and retreat activities, practiced Nadis (channels) and studied the core essence of Great Perfection. He then graduated with the highest honor from this College. Naimai Rinpoche has nearly one thousand disciples. Being the chief Khempo of the Dzogchen Shira Shing Scripture College, he even served as the mentor of the Dzogchen Buddhist Institute in Taiwan, which is sponsored by Dzogchen Monastery, one of the six great monasteries of Nyingma tradition of Tibetan "Buddhism."
Regarding the “Dzogchen Monastery,” Gongpu Zhang, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, reminds the readers that the public may still have some recollection of a full swing campaign run by the Foundation on the issue of protecting Taiwan women in the newspapers at the beginning of this year. The Foundation denounced that Linla Rinpoche, who sexually assaulted a nun in 2006, belongs to the monastery mentioned above. Naimai Rinpoche, who had sex with a prostitute, also came from the same monastery, and graduated from the same Buddhist Institute. Both of them are fellow members of the same school, and hold the title of reincarnated living “Buddha” as well as the identity of an Abbot Khenpo. They are even regarded as the “great lamas” of Dzogchen Monastery, which belongs to the Nyingma sect. Their code of practice is in accord with the provisions of “The Six Yogas of Naropa,” which was introduced to Tibet and taught by their immoral patriarchs, Naropa and Padmasambhava. In these provisions, the criterion for selecting copulating partners, the so-called “female consorts” or “Dakinis,” is not based on beauty, but only on the female genitals, that is, whether the female genitals will enable the lamas to attain sexual pleasure during the copulation practice. Therefore, all the lamas are “required to travel around the world to search for ‘distinctive’ women; the qualified female consorts must possess distinctive sexual power.” (The Six Yogas of Naropa, narrated by Blo-Bzan-Grags-Pa Zam Lam, recorded by Lu Yizhao, first edition, Morning Sunshine Culture Press, Aug. 1994, pp. 205-206). Hence, when Naimai Rinpoche claimed his innocence by saying that he is simply “studying the local customs of Taiwan," he was actually trying to look for “women with distinctive sexual power.” Their words and deeds are not surprising to us at all as it totally complies with the provisions of Tibetan “Buddhism.”
As for the issue of “violating the monastic precepts,” the CEO believes that the sin of illicit sex does not exist within Tibetan “Buddhism” because they have developed their own “samaya precepts” besides the precepts of orthodox Buddhism in order to practice the copulation tantra. They believe that “samaya precepts” surpass all Buddhist precepts. Tibetan Tantric samaya precepts even require the practitioners to practice the copulation practice with female followers frequently. For them, engaging in illicit sex according to the copulation tantra is not regarded as violating precepts, but instead, it is believed to have great merits. In other words, tantric lamas have their own interpretation on the sin of illicit sex, which is defined differently from that of orthodox Buddhism. According to the definition by Tibetan “Buddhism,” the precept of no sexual misconduct is violated only when the tantric practitioners ejaculate during sexual intercourse. Having sex with female followers is not considered as breaking the precept. Keeping the pure precept in orthodox Buddhism is not to have sex with women, but for tantric practitioners it refers to no ejaculation during sexual intercourse. The public generally regard that any monk who goes whoring is committing the crime of sexual misconduct. But the fundamental tenets of Tibetan “Buddhism” denote that such a sexual act is for practicing the “Buddha dharma” of the Highest Yoga Tantra. They even consider themselves dutifully endeavoring in cultivation. What could the decent Taiwanese do about it since the Couple-Practice Tantra is indeed the fundamental doctrine of Tibetan “Buddhism”?
Moreover, in some sects of Tibetan “Buddhism,” male practitioners who have received the secret empowerments are even allowed to have their mothers and daughters, sisters or adolescent girls as their copulating partners. Those practitioners are not considered to have violated the precept of no sexual misconduct, but are seen as those who keep the pure precept in Tibetan “Buddhism.” Furthermore, even female animals, corpses or ghosts can be regarded as the copulating partners like “Dakinis” or “Yoginis” and be used for sexual intercourse. Hence, it would not be surprising to learn that Naimai Rinpoche took the money offered by his followers to buy sex, nor will he be seen as violating the precepts. CEO Zhang points out that no wonder the director of the Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Dawa Tsering, in a BCC News Network interviewed by correspondent Yujiao Huang, said that the notion of Confucian ethics hinders the propagation of Tibetan “Buddhism.” Therefore, from the viewpoint of “Confucian ethics,” lamas’ promiscuous conduct has already violated good social customs as well as sexual morality and is devoid of humanity. Unfortunately, it has long been a “common occurrence” amongst the lamas of Tibetan “Buddhism.” (Reported by Yuyue Lin) 20111222
Editor's Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on March 7, 2011.
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/21
Please refer to the related article published on Sep. 19, 2011: The Spiritual Mentors Whom Everyone Worships by Day Become Whoremongers at Night
2011-12-09
窮也要行善 美失業者捐銀幣
[ 轉 貼 文 ]
窮也要行善 美失業者捐銀幣
中央社 – 2011年12月7日 上午7:34
（中央社記者顏伶如波特蘭6日專電）每逢耶誕季節，基督教救世軍都派義工在各地商店門口搖鈴呼籲民眾捐款。華盛頓州斯波坎收到包著紙條的銀幣，紙條寫「我失業13個月，但我仍知道有些家庭比我更困難。」
每年到了耶誕季節，在全美各地超級市場、百貨公司門口，經常可以見到慈善組織基督教救世軍（Salvation Army）的義工，搖鈴呼籲民眾捐款救援窮苦弱勢。民眾不管放多少金額到紅色的捐款筒內，義工都會表示感謝，並祝民眾佳節快樂。
基督教救世軍位於華盛頓州斯波坎（Spokane）的分部，日前從義工帶回來的捐款筒內，發現了一枚包在紙條裡的銀幣。
這張小紙條寫著：「這枚銀幣我已經保存20年。我失業13個月了，房子被法拍，也向法院聲請破產，61歲的我如今退休泡湯，不過我仍知道有些家庭的狀況比我更困難。」
當地電視台KREM報導，這枚銀幣估計市價約30美元，但基督教救世軍義工們認為，這位匿名捐贈者所分享的愛心，遠遠超過一切價值。
另外，基督教救世軍也指出，日前也從義工帶回的紅色捐款筒內，收到一枚包在1美元紙鈔當中的鑽戒，這枚鑽戒估計市價達5000美元，捐贈者同樣也是未具名。1001206
窮也要行善 美失業者捐銀幣
中央社 – 2011年12月7日 上午7:34
（中央社記者顏伶如波特蘭6日專電）每逢耶誕季節，基督教救世軍都派義工在各地商店門口搖鈴呼籲民眾捐款。華盛頓州斯波坎收到包著紙條的銀幣，紙條寫「我失業13個月，但我仍知道有些家庭比我更困難。」
每年到了耶誕季節，在全美各地超級市場、百貨公司門口，經常可以見到慈善組織基督教救世軍（Salvation Army）的義工，搖鈴呼籲民眾捐款救援窮苦弱勢。民眾不管放多少金額到紅色的捐款筒內，義工都會表示感謝，並祝民眾佳節快樂。
基督教救世軍位於華盛頓州斯波坎（Spokane）的分部，日前從義工帶回來的捐款筒內，發現了一枚包在紙條裡的銀幣。
這張小紙條寫著：「這枚銀幣我已經保存20年。我失業13個月了，房子被法拍，也向法院聲請破產，61歲的我如今退休泡湯，不過我仍知道有些家庭的狀況比我更困難。」
當地電視台KREM報導，這枚銀幣估計市價約30美元，但基督教救世軍義工們認為，這位匿名捐贈者所分享的愛心，遠遠超過一切價值。
另外，基督教救世軍也指出，日前也從義工帶回的紅色捐款筒內，收到一枚包在1美元紙鈔當中的鑽戒，這枚鑽戒估計市價達5000美元，捐贈者同樣也是未具名。1001206
2011-11-30
快捨棄吧！六字大明咒
文章來源: http://tantrastory.blogspot.com/2011/11/blog-post_21.html
記憶中…自己在尚未修學佛法時，很喜歡聽或唱誦一些經文，如：大悲咒、心經，尤其以簡短的六字大明咒最為喜愛，市面上也有女明星，出版唱誦且配樂優美的六字大明咒，而受到許多大眾的青睞，幾乎人人都會唱唸的六字大明咒：「唵、嘛、呢、叭、咪、哞」它真正的意思是甚麼？生在臺灣的我們個個「莫災央」，只是不斷被教育，唸這咒語可以避邪、消災、求財，這種一呼百應的咒語，深得大眾的愛戴，如果票選「第一名咒語」，相信「六字大明咒」一定是當仁不讓，「叫我第一名啦」。
但是…這咒語的背後隱藏的真正意思是什麼呢？沒人知道，直至日前收到友人傳來的e-mail，這才明白它的真義，看完後真是嚇出一身冷汗，原來自己長久來持著的咒語，竟是如此…！真不曉得有多少人，和我一樣被蒙在鼓裏！回想這些年來，對於「六字大明咒」的愛戴，還真是有夠冤的！
現在…就把這六字大明咒攤在陽光下，來讓大眾了解：「唵、嘛、呢、叭、咪、哞」，它的中文音譯為：「如意寶珠在蓮花上」，這看似神聖裝嚴的語句，在藏傳佛教裡真正的意思卻是：「嘛呢」是（寶珠）代表男性性器官(龜頭)，「叭咪」是（蓮花）代表女性性器官(陰部)；直接翻譯出來就是「啊！小弟弟(龜頭)在小妹妹(陰部)上」。
在藏傳佛教經文中多以「金剛杵」與「蓮花」，暗指男性性器官﹝金剛杵﹞及女性性器官﹝蓮花﹞，隱語的目的，似乎只是為了讓密教祖師傳雙身法時，可以隱言而述，如同通關密語一般。試想，若在經文或咒語中大剌剌地寫出：「啊！多美妙的龜頭」，或是「啊！多豐盈的陰部啊！」這樣誰還能唸得下去？所以，設計「蓮」和「杵」的通關密語，似乎是藏傳佛教不得不為的結果。
這也讓我想起前陣子與藝人陶子對話的喇嘛仁波切，竟把「底褲走光」作為「秀蓮花的慈悲」。現在回頭想想，這番僅有喇嘛仁波切認為是人生的智慧言論，除了令敢衝敢言的陶晶瑩咋舌外，似乎也明白宣示出，藏密喇嘛仁波切對於修學「雙身法」的不變立場！看樣子，若是有心想修學佛法，今後還是改持 諸佛名號，或是大慈大悲的 觀世音菩薩名號，才能真正與 佛、菩薩相應，得到庇蔭與加持，對於不明究裡的咒語：如藏密的六字大明咒等，還是敬謝不敏比較穩當！以免在修學佛法的道路，搬石頭砸自己的腳！本以為持咒可以感應到佛菩薩的加持，最後卻讓藏密上師誤會想要共修雙身法，一來一回之間，卻成了天下最大的冤枉！ 老實念佛吧！
如想要更進一步了解六字大明咒及它的出處，還有為什麼它是偽咒？
可以點下列網站
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kc4580455/13576580
【雙身法之六字大明咒秘密大公開】
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kc4580455&category_id=13081819
記憶中…自己在尚未修學佛法時，很喜歡聽或唱誦一些經文，如：大悲咒、心經，尤其以簡短的六字大明咒最為喜愛，市面上也有女明星，出版唱誦且配樂優美的六字大明咒，而受到許多大眾的青睞，幾乎人人都會唱唸的六字大明咒：「唵、嘛、呢、叭、咪、哞」它真正的意思是甚麼？生在臺灣的我們個個「莫災央」，只是不斷被教育，唸這咒語可以避邪、消災、求財，這種一呼百應的咒語，深得大眾的愛戴，如果票選「第一名咒語」，相信「六字大明咒」一定是當仁不讓，「叫我第一名啦」。
 |
| (圖片來源網站：album.udn.com ) |
但是…這咒語的背後隱藏的真正意思是什麼呢？沒人知道，直至日前收到友人傳來的e-mail，這才明白它的真義，看完後真是嚇出一身冷汗，原來自己長久來持著的咒語，竟是如此…！真不曉得有多少人，和我一樣被蒙在鼓裏！回想這些年來，對於「六字大明咒」的愛戴，還真是有夠冤的！
現在…就把這六字大明咒攤在陽光下，來讓大眾了解：「唵、嘛、呢、叭、咪、哞」，它的中文音譯為：「如意寶珠在蓮花上」，這看似神聖裝嚴的語句，在藏傳佛教裡真正的意思卻是：「嘛呢」是（寶珠）代表男性性器官(龜頭)，「叭咪」是（蓮花）代表女性性器官(陰部)；直接翻譯出來就是「啊！小弟弟(龜頭)在小妹妹(陰部)上」。
在藏傳佛教經文中多以「金剛杵」與「蓮花」，暗指男性性器官﹝金剛杵﹞及女性性器官﹝蓮花﹞，隱語的目的，似乎只是為了讓密教祖師傳雙身法時，可以隱言而述，如同通關密語一般。試想，若在經文或咒語中大剌剌地寫出：「啊！多美妙的龜頭」，或是「啊！多豐盈的陰部啊！」這樣誰還能唸得下去？所以，設計「蓮」和「杵」的通關密語，似乎是藏傳佛教不得不為的結果。
這也讓我想起前陣子與藝人陶子對話的喇嘛仁波切，竟把「底褲走光」作為「秀蓮花的慈悲」。現在回頭想想，這番僅有喇嘛仁波切認為是人生的智慧言論，除了令敢衝敢言的陶晶瑩咋舌外，似乎也明白宣示出，藏密喇嘛仁波切對於修學「雙身法」的不變立場！看樣子，若是有心想修學佛法，今後還是改持 諸佛名號，或是大慈大悲的 觀世音菩薩名號，才能真正與 佛、菩薩相應，得到庇蔭與加持，對於不明究裡的咒語：如藏密的六字大明咒等，還是敬謝不敏比較穩當！以免在修學佛法的道路，搬石頭砸自己的腳！本以為持咒可以感應到佛菩薩的加持，最後卻讓藏密上師誤會想要共修雙身法，一來一回之間，卻成了天下最大的冤枉！ 老實念佛吧！
 持六字大明咒不如老實念佛 |
| (圖片來源網站：buddhanet.idv.tw) |
如想要更進一步了解六字大明咒及它的出處，還有為什麼它是偽咒？
可以點下列網站
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kc4580455/13576580
【雙身法之六字大明咒秘密大公開】
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kc4580455&category_id=13081819
2011-11-27
素食者比肉食者更有耐力且強壯
對於素食，最大的誤解之一就是「它會使得一個人變得衰弱、缺少活力，蒼白而且病懨懨地」。但事實上，許多的研究顯示，素食者較肉食者更為強壯、敏捷而有耐力，而且不分小孩與大人都是一樣。
※貝爾京大學的史考特登博士曾做過測驗，就肉食者與素食者在疲勞過後恢復耐力、強壯與敏捷三方面做比較。他的研究發現指出，素食者在這三方面的表現都較為優越。
※耶魯大學的愛文‧費舍博士在一九○六午與一九○七年做過耐力測驗。耶魯的運動員、教師、醫生與護士都參與了這項研究。令人驚訝的證據顯示，素食者的精力幾乎是肉食者的兩倍。密西根大學也有人做過類似的實驗印證他的說法。
※布魯塞爾大學的吉伯尼與艾歐特克博士所作研究，均證實了費舍博士的比較。在耐力測驗方面，素食者在筋疲力竭之前比肉食者所能負荷的時間多二到三倍。而且每次測驗完之後從疲勞中恢復過來的時間，只需同樣參與測驗的肉食者的五分之一。
這些令人震驚的結果顯示，素食無論在體力、耐力與效率上都是較為優越。事實上，世界上最有力而長壽的動物都是素食的。馬、牛、水牛、大象等都擁有強壯而健康的身體。他們的力氣與耐力能為人類搬運動物以及其他粗重的工作。沒有那一種肉食性勤物能有這種精力與耐力。
很有趣的一頊發現就是，許多締造世界記錄的運動員也都是素食者。
※英國的素食者自行車俱樂部多年來一直保持百分之四十的全國自行車比賽記錄。而在全歐洲，素食自行車選手比肉食選手得勝的百分比更高。
※偉大的素食游泳選手，穆瑞‧羅斯，是奧林匹克運動會上三項金牌的最年輕的得主。他曾被認為是史上最偉大的游泳選手，並且打破多項記錄。一位英國的素食者游過英吉利海峽的速度，「六小時二十分」比歷史上任何人都要快。
※許多國際有名的運動員，後來改吃素食之後。譬如奧國的舉重選手安德森，曾贏得多項世界記錄，以及威斯穆勒，曾創下五十六項世界游泳記錄。他們說「力量並不因此而減少」；事實上，他們的能力似乎更為增長或至少保存原有的水準。
※比爾‧華頓，國際知名的籃球明星，以擅長攻擊、苦戰而出名。他個人的經驗使他確信素食的利益，他也一再向別人宣揚這種養生之道。
全世界素食者曾經締造多項記錄。摔角、拳擊、競走、足球、越過國境賽跑。事實上素食者之所以有較大的耐力與精力乃由於他們「不必浪費大量的精力與肉中的毒素對抗」。
不吃肉營養夠嗎？
當人們想到素食時，往往會擔心一個問題：「如果我不吃肉，我能得到充份的營養嗎？蛋白質夠嗎？」事實根本不用擔心。素食品能供應所有身體需要的養份。許多科學研究顯示，素食品提供的營養熱能超過了肉類。
我們一直都誤信，「為了健康吃肉是必要的」。在一九五○年代科學家將肉類蛋白規劃為「第一類」而素食品為「第二類」。但是這種分類已經完全被推翻。因為素食蛋白與肉類蛋白在營養效用上是完全相等的。這種區分已經不存在了。
在素食品中蛋白質的含量極其豐富，麥穀類約含百分之八到十二，而黃豆竟然高達百分之四十，是肉類的兩倍（即使是最瘦的牛排也只有百分之二十可用的蛋白質）。許多的堅果、種籽與豆類有百分之三十的蛋白質。「我們所需要的蛋白質主要是由八種氨基酸組成」。肉類之所以被認為比較優越就因為它含有八種氨基酸。肉食者通常不瞭解的一點就是肉類並非是唯一的完全蛋白質來源—譬如黃豆與牛奶，同樣也是完全蛋白質。那就是它們能夠適當地供應我們所需要的八種氨基酸。
一個值得注意的事實就是，完全蛋白質很容易就能依靠著同時吃兩種非肉類食品就可得到（譬如米與豆類）。如此高品質的組合所造成的蛋白質價值遠超過單項食品。世界各地的窮人似乎不知不覺地就把米飯與豆腐或豆類，或者玉米與豆類等合在一起吃。
在一九七二年，哈佛大學的菲特烈史達博士曾就素食者做過一項廣泛的研究（包括成年男女、孕婦以及青春期的男女。）他發現他們所攝取的蛋白質含量是每人每天基本需求量的兩倍。在一九五四年，科學家們在哈佛做了一項詳細研究，發現只要把蔬菜、穀類及其他農產品做任意組合就可得到足夠的蛋白質。不論使用的是任何的調配組合，每種蛋白質都能發揮其效益。科學家們於是下結論說，吃各種素食品，其中的蛋白質含量均足夠人體所需要。
從報紙上，我們常看到貧窮國家的人民營養不良，是由於缺乏蛋白質，而面臨饑餓與死亡。但是科學家們發現，這些人之所以營養不良，並非由於他們不吃肉，而是「由於他們吃的食物不夠所致」。如果只有吃飯或只吃馬鈴薯（很少有人這樣），自然會使一個人營養不良或早死。相對的，世界上任何地方，如果素食者能夠攝取適當的卡洛里，以及充足的蔬菜、穀類與豆類，那麼他應該可以成為一個健康，強壯而有活力的人。
過去我們一直根深蒂固地相信，不吃肉我們不可能得到健康。但是現在事實證明正好相反。
文章來源: http://book.bfnn.org/books/0498.htm
※貝爾京大學的史考特登博士曾做過測驗，就肉食者與素食者在疲勞過後恢復耐力、強壯與敏捷三方面做比較。他的研究發現指出，素食者在這三方面的表現都較為優越。
※耶魯大學的愛文‧費舍博士在一九○六午與一九○七年做過耐力測驗。耶魯的運動員、教師、醫生與護士都參與了這項研究。令人驚訝的證據顯示，素食者的精力幾乎是肉食者的兩倍。密西根大學也有人做過類似的實驗印證他的說法。
※布魯塞爾大學的吉伯尼與艾歐特克博士所作研究，均證實了費舍博士的比較。在耐力測驗方面，素食者在筋疲力竭之前比肉食者所能負荷的時間多二到三倍。而且每次測驗完之後從疲勞中恢復過來的時間，只需同樣參與測驗的肉食者的五分之一。
這些令人震驚的結果顯示，素食無論在體力、耐力與效率上都是較為優越。事實上，世界上最有力而長壽的動物都是素食的。馬、牛、水牛、大象等都擁有強壯而健康的身體。他們的力氣與耐力能為人類搬運動物以及其他粗重的工作。沒有那一種肉食性勤物能有這種精力與耐力。
很有趣的一頊發現就是，許多締造世界記錄的運動員也都是素食者。
※英國的素食者自行車俱樂部多年來一直保持百分之四十的全國自行車比賽記錄。而在全歐洲，素食自行車選手比肉食選手得勝的百分比更高。
※偉大的素食游泳選手，穆瑞‧羅斯，是奧林匹克運動會上三項金牌的最年輕的得主。他曾被認為是史上最偉大的游泳選手，並且打破多項記錄。一位英國的素食者游過英吉利海峽的速度，「六小時二十分」比歷史上任何人都要快。
※許多國際有名的運動員，後來改吃素食之後。譬如奧國的舉重選手安德森，曾贏得多項世界記錄，以及威斯穆勒，曾創下五十六項世界游泳記錄。他們說「力量並不因此而減少」；事實上，他們的能力似乎更為增長或至少保存原有的水準。
※比爾‧華頓，國際知名的籃球明星，以擅長攻擊、苦戰而出名。他個人的經驗使他確信素食的利益，他也一再向別人宣揚這種養生之道。
全世界素食者曾經締造多項記錄。摔角、拳擊、競走、足球、越過國境賽跑。事實上素食者之所以有較大的耐力與精力乃由於他們「不必浪費大量的精力與肉中的毒素對抗」。
不吃肉營養夠嗎？
當人們想到素食時，往往會擔心一個問題：「如果我不吃肉，我能得到充份的營養嗎？蛋白質夠嗎？」事實根本不用擔心。素食品能供應所有身體需要的養份。許多科學研究顯示，素食品提供的營養熱能超過了肉類。
我們一直都誤信，「為了健康吃肉是必要的」。在一九五○年代科學家將肉類蛋白規劃為「第一類」而素食品為「第二類」。但是這種分類已經完全被推翻。因為素食蛋白與肉類蛋白在營養效用上是完全相等的。這種區分已經不存在了。
在素食品中蛋白質的含量極其豐富，麥穀類約含百分之八到十二，而黃豆竟然高達百分之四十，是肉類的兩倍（即使是最瘦的牛排也只有百分之二十可用的蛋白質）。許多的堅果、種籽與豆類有百分之三十的蛋白質。「我們所需要的蛋白質主要是由八種氨基酸組成」。肉類之所以被認為比較優越就因為它含有八種氨基酸。肉食者通常不瞭解的一點就是肉類並非是唯一的完全蛋白質來源—譬如黃豆與牛奶，同樣也是完全蛋白質。那就是它們能夠適當地供應我們所需要的八種氨基酸。
一個值得注意的事實就是，完全蛋白質很容易就能依靠著同時吃兩種非肉類食品就可得到（譬如米與豆類）。如此高品質的組合所造成的蛋白質價值遠超過單項食品。世界各地的窮人似乎不知不覺地就把米飯與豆腐或豆類，或者玉米與豆類等合在一起吃。
在一九七二年，哈佛大學的菲特烈史達博士曾就素食者做過一項廣泛的研究（包括成年男女、孕婦以及青春期的男女。）他發現他們所攝取的蛋白質含量是每人每天基本需求量的兩倍。在一九五四年，科學家們在哈佛做了一項詳細研究，發現只要把蔬菜、穀類及其他農產品做任意組合就可得到足夠的蛋白質。不論使用的是任何的調配組合，每種蛋白質都能發揮其效益。科學家們於是下結論說，吃各種素食品，其中的蛋白質含量均足夠人體所需要。
從報紙上，我們常看到貧窮國家的人民營養不良，是由於缺乏蛋白質，而面臨饑餓與死亡。但是科學家們發現，這些人之所以營養不良，並非由於他們不吃肉，而是「由於他們吃的食物不夠所致」。如果只有吃飯或只吃馬鈴薯（很少有人這樣），自然會使一個人營養不良或早死。相對的，世界上任何地方，如果素食者能夠攝取適當的卡洛里，以及充足的蔬菜、穀類與豆類，那麼他應該可以成為一個健康，強壯而有活力的人。
過去我們一直根深蒂固地相信，不吃肉我們不可能得到健康。但是現在事實證明正好相反。
文章來源: http://book.bfnn.org/books/0498.htm
2011-11-25
做什麼善事可以讓一個人一輩子救1700條命？
以目前英國人每星期有2000人改吃素的情況來看，到了2047年，全英國可能都是素食主義者。
根據一項調查顯示，英國現在有百分之六的人口吃全素，有四成的民眾則是每星期至少挑一天不吃肉。消費者分析機構的人員表示：「有些人聽到2047年全英國人都吃素可能會嚇一跳，但其實這代表我們進入一個新時代，英國人終於開始瞭解並尊重環境。」
英國是歐洲國家中素食人口第二高的國家，僅次於德國。
-----補充驚人資料（英國）------
根據統計，一輩子吃素的一名英國人，大約可省下：
760隻雞，
5頭牛，
20隻豬，
20頭羊，
半噸的魚。
這亦意味著，將有一大片森林可以被保留下來。
-----補充驚人資料（台灣）------
2003年，美國人一年吃掉91.5億隻動物（不含水產），美國約有2億7千萬人，因此每人每年吃掉 34隻動物，加上魚蝦類則更多。請注意，這是2003年的數字，美國每年被屠殺作為盤中餐的動物數字每年都在增加中。
因此，在美國，只要一人棄肉茹素，每年就可救34隻動物。
根據台灣農委會發佈的資料，臺灣在2003年吃掉近60萬噸的雞肉，以一隻雞2公斤 計算，臺灣人每年吃掉約3億隻雞。
因此，臺灣每人每年吃掉14隻雞，一個一生吃50年素的臺灣人，終其一生可以救 1700隻雞免於被屠宰及在養殖場被虐待。
再加上豬牛羊魚蝦海鮮等其他動物，這個數字相當可觀。
做什麼善事可以讓一個人一輩子救1700條命？ 就是只要能控制嘴巴、筷子，開始吃素就可以了！
原始文章來自: http://www.a202.idv.tw/discuz/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=14079&fromuid=6511
根據一項調查顯示，英國現在有百分之六的人口吃全素，有四成的民眾則是每星期至少挑一天不吃肉。消費者分析機構的人員表示：「有些人聽到2047年全英國人都吃素可能會嚇一跳，但其實這代表我們進入一個新時代，英國人終於開始瞭解並尊重環境。」
英國是歐洲國家中素食人口第二高的國家，僅次於德國。
-----補充驚人資料（英國）------
根據統計，一輩子吃素的一名英國人，大約可省下：
760隻雞，
5頭牛，
20隻豬，
20頭羊，
半噸的魚。
這亦意味著，將有一大片森林可以被保留下來。
-----補充驚人資料（台灣）------
2003年，美國人一年吃掉91.5億隻動物（不含水產），美國約有2億7千萬人，因此每人每年吃掉 34隻動物，加上魚蝦類則更多。請注意，這是2003年的數字，美國每年被屠殺作為盤中餐的動物數字每年都在增加中。
因此，在美國，只要一人棄肉茹素，每年就可救34隻動物。
根據台灣農委會發佈的資料，臺灣在2003年吃掉近60萬噸的雞肉，以一隻雞2公斤 計算，臺灣人每年吃掉約3億隻雞。
因此，臺灣每人每年吃掉14隻雞，一個一生吃50年素的臺灣人，終其一生可以救 1700隻雞免於被屠宰及在養殖場被虐待。
再加上豬牛羊魚蝦海鮮等其他動物，這個數字相當可觀。
做什麼善事可以讓一個人一輩子救1700條命？ 就是只要能控制嘴巴、筷子，開始吃素就可以了！
原始文章來自: http://www.a202.idv.tw/discuz/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=14079&fromuid=6511
2011-11-23
Why is Tibetan “Buddhism” not Buddhism? - Part One of a Series Report -
(By Lin Yuyue of the True Heart News Interviewing Team in Taipei) Zhang Gongpu, CEO of the True Enlightenment Education Foundation, says that although Tibetan “Buddhism” carries the name of Buddhism, it is actually a non-Buddhist school. Although its doctrine carries many Buddhist terms, it has nothing to do with Buddhism. It has completely changed the true Buddhism to a purely heretic one. Therefore, Tibetan “Buddhism” is fundamentally non-Buddhism. It is because Tibetan “Buddhism” does not take Buddha Sakyamuni as the ultimate teacher to rely on. All beginners of Tibetan “Buddhism” are instructed to firmly believe that their root gurus are the same without distinction as Buddhas and are even asked to honor and obey their root gurus more than Buddhas.
CEO Zhang further explains that the Buddha of Buddhism is Buddha Sakyamuni, the primary teacher. He did attain his Buddhahood through realizing the true mind and seeing the Buddha-nature. Having attained his unsurpassed perfect Buddhahood, He wholly deserves the ten titles of the Buddha: The One Worthy of Offering, The One with Right and Universal Knowledge, The One Perfected in Wisdom and Actions, Well Gone One, Teacher of Gods and Men, The One Who Understands the World, Unsurpassed Lord, Regulating Hero, Buddha, and The World Honored One. He became a Buddha through the root dhyanas(禪定)– the four-dhyanas(四禪). He has perfectly fulfilled the four Prajnas to become a Buddha: His eighth vijnana(識) has achieved the Prajna of Grand Perfect Mirror; His seventh vijana has achieved the Prajna of Equality in Nature; His sixth vijnana has achieved the Prajna of Wondrous Observations; His first five vijnanas have achieved the Prajna of Accomplishing Deeds. He can start to teach Dharma to save beings right after becoming a Buddha. Everyone who has listened to the Buddha’s teachings can attain the pure dharma-eye (the First Fruition of liberation), and so on, including the Fourth Fruition of liberation as an arhat, and later, one might further become an enlightened bodhisattva who realizes True Suchness.
CEO Zhang continues: Tibetan “Buddhism” on the contrary claims it can make followers to “attain Buddhahood in a lifetime.” However, the term “Buddha” in Tibetan “Buddhism” refers to the “couple-body ‘Buddha’.” Both the male and the female of a couple can become “Buddha” through sexual intercourse. The process to attain Buddhahood in Tibetan “Buddhism” is not through practicing the four-dhyanas or through realizing the true reality of the dharma-realm, but through sexual enjoyment to achieve the “joyful couple-body ‘Buddhas’.” It is stated in the Buddhist sutra that a female body has obstacles that prevent her from becoming the following five beings: (1) a Brahma Heaven King, (2) Lord Shakra, (3) the king of Maras, (4) a Wheel-Turning Sage King, and (5) a Buddha. The Buddha states clearly that women possess these five obstacles; logically speaking, how can women “become Buddhas in a lifetime”? Besides, attaining Buddhahood is based on the wisdom of all seeds stored in the true mind, Tathagatagarbha(如來藏). However, the teachings of Tibetan “Buddhism,” both the Svatantrika Madhyamika and the Prasangika Madhyamika, all negate the eighth vijnana Tathagatagarbha. They flagrantly violate the Buddha’s true teachings and openly claim that the conscious mind is the everlasting and indestructible mind. Therefore, this is apparent that the doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” have nothing to do with those of Buddhism and are all based on their own illusory and fallacious views.
CEO Zhang concludes: The fruition of Buddhahood, practice methods and sequence preached by Tibetan “Buddhism” have nothing to do with the teachings of Buddha Sakyamuni, the founder of Buddhism. No matter how Tibetan Buddhists argue speciously or brag about their close ties with Buddhism, they should not claim the obscene and filthy copulation games as part of Buddhist practices. If Tibetan “Buddhism” can claim itself as Lamaism instead of Buddhism, the True Enlightenment Education Foundation would not bother to interfere, nor would the Foundation have the right to poke into the promiscuous practices of Tibetan “Buddhism.” However, Tibetan “Buddhism” fools the Buddhist community and the public by claiming its obscene and devious practice methods as the way to “Buddhahood.” Everyone who has a sense of justice should step forward and expose their fraud. All dharma masters, monks, and followers of Buddhism should speak out against Tibetan “Buddhism” and expel this non-Buddhist, the Dharma destroyer, out of Buddhism. (Reported by Lin Yuyue) 20111121
Editor's Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on May 30, 2011
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/19
CEO Zhang further explains that the Buddha of Buddhism is Buddha Sakyamuni, the primary teacher. He did attain his Buddhahood through realizing the true mind and seeing the Buddha-nature. Having attained his unsurpassed perfect Buddhahood, He wholly deserves the ten titles of the Buddha: The One Worthy of Offering, The One with Right and Universal Knowledge, The One Perfected in Wisdom and Actions, Well Gone One, Teacher of Gods and Men, The One Who Understands the World, Unsurpassed Lord, Regulating Hero, Buddha, and The World Honored One. He became a Buddha through the root dhyanas(禪定)– the four-dhyanas(四禪). He has perfectly fulfilled the four Prajnas to become a Buddha: His eighth vijnana(識) has achieved the Prajna of Grand Perfect Mirror; His seventh vijana has achieved the Prajna of Equality in Nature; His sixth vijnana has achieved the Prajna of Wondrous Observations; His first five vijnanas have achieved the Prajna of Accomplishing Deeds. He can start to teach Dharma to save beings right after becoming a Buddha. Everyone who has listened to the Buddha’s teachings can attain the pure dharma-eye (the First Fruition of liberation), and so on, including the Fourth Fruition of liberation as an arhat, and later, one might further become an enlightened bodhisattva who realizes True Suchness.
CEO Zhang continues: Tibetan “Buddhism” on the contrary claims it can make followers to “attain Buddhahood in a lifetime.” However, the term “Buddha” in Tibetan “Buddhism” refers to the “couple-body ‘Buddha’.” Both the male and the female of a couple can become “Buddha” through sexual intercourse. The process to attain Buddhahood in Tibetan “Buddhism” is not through practicing the four-dhyanas or through realizing the true reality of the dharma-realm, but through sexual enjoyment to achieve the “joyful couple-body ‘Buddhas’.” It is stated in the Buddhist sutra that a female body has obstacles that prevent her from becoming the following five beings: (1) a Brahma Heaven King, (2) Lord Shakra, (3) the king of Maras, (4) a Wheel-Turning Sage King, and (5) a Buddha. The Buddha states clearly that women possess these five obstacles; logically speaking, how can women “become Buddhas in a lifetime”? Besides, attaining Buddhahood is based on the wisdom of all seeds stored in the true mind, Tathagatagarbha(如來藏). However, the teachings of Tibetan “Buddhism,” both the Svatantrika Madhyamika and the Prasangika Madhyamika, all negate the eighth vijnana Tathagatagarbha. They flagrantly violate the Buddha’s true teachings and openly claim that the conscious mind is the everlasting and indestructible mind. Therefore, this is apparent that the doctrines of Tibetan “Buddhism” have nothing to do with those of Buddhism and are all based on their own illusory and fallacious views.
CEO Zhang concludes: The fruition of Buddhahood, practice methods and sequence preached by Tibetan “Buddhism” have nothing to do with the teachings of Buddha Sakyamuni, the founder of Buddhism. No matter how Tibetan Buddhists argue speciously or brag about their close ties with Buddhism, they should not claim the obscene and filthy copulation games as part of Buddhist practices. If Tibetan “Buddhism” can claim itself as Lamaism instead of Buddhism, the True Enlightenment Education Foundation would not bother to interfere, nor would the Foundation have the right to poke into the promiscuous practices of Tibetan “Buddhism.” However, Tibetan “Buddhism” fools the Buddhist community and the public by claiming its obscene and devious practice methods as the way to “Buddhahood.” Everyone who has a sense of justice should step forward and expose their fraud. All dharma masters, monks, and followers of Buddhism should speak out against Tibetan “Buddhism” and expel this non-Buddhist, the Dharma destroyer, out of Buddhism. (Reported by Lin Yuyue) 20111121
Editor's Note:
This article is an English version of the Chinese edition published on May 30, 2011
Reference Source: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart_en/19
真心新聞網: 藏傳佛教達瓦才仁愈描愈黑
（真心新聞網採訪組台北報導）藏傳佛教邪淫喇嘛貢噶仁千多杰仁波切（也就是台中聖德禪寺住持聖輪喇嘛），對女義工猥褻案爆發以來，迭有波瀾轉折，自由時報11月14日的新聞報導：達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會董事長達瓦才仁昨強調，藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為，在台灣，有很多打著「藏傳佛教」或「密宗」名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術，卻讓藏傳佛教遭受很大傷害，若修行者對所修法門有疑義，可向基金會求證，是否為正統藏傳佛教的傳承者。此言一出，識者無不嗤之以鼻，從回應的留言看來，社會大眾也早已漸漸廣開見識，心中自有評判，不再相信藏傳佛教辯駁的鬼話。
自由時報 – 2011年11月14日週一
http://tw.omg.yahoo.com/news/%E8%81%96%E8%BC%AA%E7%96%91%E6%90%9E%E9%9B%99%E4%BF%AE-%E5%86%8D%E7%88%86%E6%AF%94%E4%B8%98%E5%B0%BC%E6%B6%89%E5%AA%92%E5%90%88-203343076.html
正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕先生指出，本會早已多次分析藏傳佛教每遇喇嘛性侵、性醜聞爆發時，自有一套脫身閃躲的處理模式和卸責諉罪的詭辯說詞，即所謂「否認、切割、轉移焦點、淡化」四部曲。正如藏傳佛教達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會董事長達瓦才仁以往的發言一樣，先是「否認」，說「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為」，然後「切割」說是「在台灣，有很多打著「藏傳佛教」或「密宗」名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」，再然後「轉移焦點」順便「打人者譁救人」說「卻讓藏傳佛教遭受很大傷害」，然後信誓旦旦地說：「若修行者對所修法門有疑義，可向基金會求證，是否為正統藏傳佛教的傳承者。」使不知內情者信以為真。執行長預言：藏傳佛教這種公然的謊言說多了，以後大家聽久了都知道全是謊言，無人願意信受，藏傳佛教最後必定龜縮起來閉口噤聲，坐等事件「淡化」，才又重新出來跳樑。
執行長表示，如果正覺基金會只是後知後覺，就不會站出來為揭穿藏傳佛教真面目，和救護台灣婦女免於喇嘛宗教性侵而大聲疾呼了。偏偏正覺基金會算準了藏傳佛教一定會犯案不斷，老早就一再為藏傳佛教預記了他們「犯罪&脫罪」的模式和說詞；而藏傳佛教的喇嘛們仍不知悔改，仍然在又見事發火燒眉睫時，不得不往當中跳；這正坐實了藏傳佛教教義的邪惡本質，導致在「性侵女信徒」這件事上再三累犯的醜陋事實，和犯後企圖掙扎脫困被人看破手腳的狼狽。因此，事件曝光後，藏傳佛教的狡辯，是完全禁不起分析，更得不到社會信任的。
執行長進一步逐句解析說明，藏傳佛教發言人辯稱：「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為」，事實上傳佛教經典「密續」中最高成就的「無上瑜伽」正是藉著再三再四的秘密灌頂，以男女雙身實修「樂空雙運」，達到所謂「樂空不二」而成就，這是藏傳佛教對內對外都已公開的事實。就連現任藏傳佛教最高精神領袖的第十四世達賴喇嘛，在其所著的達賴喇嘛文集（3）──《西藏佛教的修行道》第56頁中都曾寫道：「在無上瑜伽續中，即使是第一步的接受灌頂，都必在男性和女性佛交抱的面前成辦。五方佛必須有明妃陪伴。……此外，密續提到在圓滿次第的修行過程中，行者在到達某一境界時，就要尋找一位異性同修，作為進一步證道的衝力。在這些男女交合的情況中，如果有一方的證悟較高，就能夠促成雙方同時解脫或證果。」白紙黑字鐵證如山。
而另一本著作《達賴生死書》則以：「具有堅定慈悲及智慧的修行者，可以在修行之道上運用性交，以性交做為強大意識專注的方法，然後顯現出本有的澄明心。目的是要實證及延長心的更深刻層面，然後用此力量加強對空性的了悟。」清楚的說明了藏傳佛教所說的「慈悲及智慧」不過是指「在修行之道上運用性交」，而其「對空性的了悟」，也還是指在延長性交中以此「強大意識專注的方法」把淫樂中的覺知心，當成了佛法究竟的證境，殊不知這種淫樂境界其實與佛法的實證全然無關----八竿子也打不著。藏傳佛教的祖師爺宗喀巴，更主張藏傳佛教「修行人」，必須二六時中（每天24小時）不中斷雙身法的實修，更在其《密宗道次第廣論》卷十四戌二〈時輪規〉中，竟然教誡其藏傳佛教中的上師和弟子 ：「汝可殺有情，受用他人女，不與汝可取，一切說妄語。」因此，執行長表示藏傳佛教官方發言人的說詞純是狡辯，應該說為「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人『不從事』與女性有雙修的行為」，才符合事實。而宗喀巴正是達賴喇嘛所崇奉的黃教創教祖師，達瓦才仁又正是達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長，如今他在具有藏傳佛教正式法脈傳承的聖輪喇嘛爆出性侵醜聞時，出來謊稱「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為，在台灣，有很多打著藏傳佛教或密宗名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」，仍是重施故計欺騙台灣人，這已證明達瓦才仁所說的這一類謊言都是不值得信任的，而他這一類謊言已經講過很多次了。
其次，對於藏傳佛教達瓦才仁所說的「在台灣，有很多打著『藏傳佛教』或『密宗』名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」，張執行長表示，從目前所見已經曝光的歷年來藏傳佛教性醜聞、性侵女信徒事件，涉案主角絕大多數都是具有喇嘛、上師的身份，甚至都是經過認證的法王、活佛、堪布、仁波切，具載於報端雜誌，現臉於電視螢幕，這都是大家眼見的事實；基金會所發放的公益DM已舉證不少事實例證，網路上原文轉載國外各大媒體的有關報導更是不勝枚舉。執行長也慨嘆，藏傳佛教喇嘛們在接受人家禮拜尊敬、供養大把鈔票時就大方的予以認證；一旦性侵案東窗事發，便立刻翻臉否認，指責這些依照宗喀巴教導而與女信徒合修雙身法的喇嘛是「騙術」，何其現實冷酷，真令人傻眼。更何況另有一些依附藏傳佛教的外圍團體或個人，他們會藉淫行設教修道，也都是直、間接學習藏傳佛教邪法而致。以致警檢蒐證，總是能查獲大批藏傳佛教獨有的書籍、文宣、禳祝儀軌和名相、唐卡、旗幡乃至種種「歡喜佛像」。這些都是三十年前台灣社會所沒有的現象，藏傳佛教正應為染污寶島這塊淨土而懺罪悔過；不料達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長達瓦才仁竟又如同以前一般不知自咎，反以責人，說什麼「在台灣，有很多打著『藏傳佛教』或『密宗』名目者，在外招搖撞騙」，等於指稱聖輪喇嘛是沒有正式傳承的假冒喇嘛，以圖繼續矇騙台灣人。執行長直斥，這正是標準的「做賊的喊捉賊」啊。
執行長指出，藏傳佛教的達瓦才仁說「像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」；那麼達賴喇嘛在書中公然教導藏傳佛教信徒們「雙修、淫人妻」，那麼達瓦才仁的意思是不是說「達賴喇嘛的行為也是騙術」？不僅是在台灣，事實上在西藏、在大陸、在印度、在澳洲乃至一向最挺達賴的歐洲和美國，多年來「『藏傳佛教』或『密宗』一直在打著這一類名目，到處斂財騙色」；所經過的地方也都不斷的鬧出性侵、性醜聞，不但暴露在各大媒體上，甚至多有進入法律訴訟程序，並被判定罪刑。以致近年來世界上許多國家和地區已然清醒轉頭，紛紛對藏傳佛教開始做理性的觀察和省思，不再像早年對他們一味的好奇與盲信盲從。執行長表示，藏傳佛教這一方面早已在世界上顏面丟盡，達瓦才仁卻還在台灣這塊對他們極為寬容友善的地方裝無辜。
藏傳佛教達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長達瓦才仁還作態說：「若修行者對所修法門有疑義，可向基金會求證，是否為正統藏傳佛教的傳承者。」執行長指斥，藏傳佛教對現前發生的人證物證俱在的事實，都還在想盡辦法規避扭曲；對於薩加派哦巴法王祿頂堪仁波切親自授位傳法的「金剛阿闍黎」，並親自認證賜名、舉辦坐床大典的「貢噶仁千多杰仁波切」聖輪喇嘛，都能翻臉否認，前言後語不一樣。試問，如此還能向他們求證個什麼？何況密宗之門幽暗深似海，一旦藏傳佛教信徒「修行者對所修法門有疑義」，真的跑去問個傳承什麼的，只恐怕「鴨寮內沒有過夜的蚯蚓」，只有羊入虎口易入難出之虞；遠離藏傳佛教不暇，誰需要聽他們愈描愈黑的自說自話？
執行長指出，藏傳佛教聖輪仁波切的性侵疑雲，發展至今媒體已經有過「揭發」、「檢警再度搜寺」以及「深入各方訪談」等三波轉折的報導；而藏傳佛教的代表，達賴喇嘛的駐台官方發言人達瓦才仁也如同以往一般作了「否認」、「切割」和「轉移焦點」等三步驟，卻是硬拗而虛答的回應，就像烏賊狂吐墨汁一樣愈描愈黑。執行長表示，接下來藏傳佛教方面就要利用這一股「大家都已經各說各話」的障眼煙霧從中遁形，讓話題漸漸「淡化」，讓藏傳佛教喇嘛涉案性侵婦女的共同記憶漸被模糊。執行長呼應，社會大眾不能任由藏傳佛教片面發言脫困，就疏於追查事實的真相，因為若是失去社會大眾整體的持續警覺和關心，則受害於藏傳佛教邪淫迫害的婦女，是孤單無助而置身危險中的。
中時電子報報導：【在聖輪法師案中，引人好奇的就是圍繞在法師旁眾多「貼身助理」比丘尼們所扮演的角色。最早擔任助理的安師父到案後供稱，「命是師父救的，所以師父說的話都是對的」，她曾遭家暴，帶孩子逃出後，聖輪支助她的孩子讀書，讓她對聖輪的話絕對服從。】 【檢警調查發現，聖輪對「貼身比丘尼」已達完全洗腦程度，讓她們願意去找女信徒來與法師進行「心靈對話」，過程中還會試圖去降低女信徒們的戒心，在女信徒被猥褻、性侵同時，還會不斷安撫她們「這樣是正常的」、「這是必要的程序」，被害人在半推半就下被侵害，事後還會問比丘尼們『這樣是對的嗎？』】聞之令人不忍。
中時電子報 – 2011年11月15日
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%81%96%E8%BC%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%B8%AB%E6%B6%89%E6%80%A7%E4%BE%B5%E6%A1%88-%E6%AF%94%E4%B8%98%E5%B0%BC%E6%89%BE%E5%A5%B3%E7%9C%BE-%E6%B3%95%E5%B8%AB%E6%84%9B%E6%9E%97%E5%BF%97%E7%8E%B2%E6%AC%BE-213000188.html
張執行長表示，藏傳佛教正是利用台灣人民崇佛敬天的善根，在此「開疆拓土」紮根發展；也利用了台灣百姓尊師重道的善良稟性，對此地的信眾強取豪多予取予求。他們坐上高位享盡了信徒的膜拜和供養，一面又極其下作的利用藏傳佛教的邪淫教義和種種矯作方便，性侵女信徒並給女信徒的丈夫戴上綠帽子。更可惡的是他們假冒「佛教」之名而犯下這些惡做與罪行，把無量無邊的罪孽留給終其一生都在「這樣是對的嗎？」的惶惑和自我懷疑的女信眾們；甚至把直接、間接的「受害者」加重催眠，致使彼等因為罪疚內化而反投入「加害者」的一方。執行長指出，這樣的惡性循環，將使藏傳佛教的「弘傳」像滾雪球，或是更像癌細胞一樣的迅速畸形發展，不知底蘊的人還誤以為藏傳佛教多麼有感染力，事實上這個罪孽共同體的增生蔓延，必定腐蝕人心，瓦解道德藩籬和社會規範，使得台灣變得病態而脆弱，動搖整個社會的穩定和國家發展。
執行長指出，台灣這個社會一再經歷藏傳佛教帶來的衝擊、不堪和傷痛，事實已經證明正覺教育基金會一向的辯正和提醒是對的：藏傳佛教不是佛教，喇嘛不是佛門的修行人，他們的教義與邪見會導致學佛人修行的偏差、下墮，他們所依止的邪戒與邪修行會導致從學的女信徒受到性侵害。執行長呼籲，佛教及社會各界，以及社會大眾應該為維護台灣的安穩清淨、保護台灣的婦女同胞站出來，大家一面從加強宗教立法，加重宗教性侵的防制和罰則等站穩腳跟；另一面也從社會教育、加強宗教通識入手，使大家都能建立正確的宗教知見和信仰上的抉擇能力，讓山寨版的偽冒佛教現形，尤其讓壞人法身慧命的藏傳佛教遠離台灣，不再危害台灣的婦女。(採訪組報導)20111121
正覺教育基金會採訪組
此篇文章報導來自: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart/165
自由時報 – 2011年11月14日週一
http://tw.omg.yahoo.com/news/%E8%81%96%E8%BC%AA%E7%96%91%E6%90%9E%E9%9B%99%E4%BF%AE-%E5%86%8D%E7%88%86%E6%AF%94%E4%B8%98%E5%B0%BC%E6%B6%89%E5%AA%92%E5%90%88-203343076.html
正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕先生指出，本會早已多次分析藏傳佛教每遇喇嘛性侵、性醜聞爆發時，自有一套脫身閃躲的處理模式和卸責諉罪的詭辯說詞，即所謂「否認、切割、轉移焦點、淡化」四部曲。正如藏傳佛教達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會董事長達瓦才仁以往的發言一樣，先是「否認」，說「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為」，然後「切割」說是「在台灣，有很多打著「藏傳佛教」或「密宗」名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」，再然後「轉移焦點」順便「打人者譁救人」說「卻讓藏傳佛教遭受很大傷害」，然後信誓旦旦地說：「若修行者對所修法門有疑義，可向基金會求證，是否為正統藏傳佛教的傳承者。」使不知內情者信以為真。執行長預言：藏傳佛教這種公然的謊言說多了，以後大家聽久了都知道全是謊言，無人願意信受，藏傳佛教最後必定龜縮起來閉口噤聲，坐等事件「淡化」，才又重新出來跳樑。
執行長表示，如果正覺基金會只是後知後覺，就不會站出來為揭穿藏傳佛教真面目，和救護台灣婦女免於喇嘛宗教性侵而大聲疾呼了。偏偏正覺基金會算準了藏傳佛教一定會犯案不斷，老早就一再為藏傳佛教預記了他們「犯罪&脫罪」的模式和說詞；而藏傳佛教的喇嘛們仍不知悔改，仍然在又見事發火燒眉睫時，不得不往當中跳；這正坐實了藏傳佛教教義的邪惡本質，導致在「性侵女信徒」這件事上再三累犯的醜陋事實，和犯後企圖掙扎脫困被人看破手腳的狼狽。因此，事件曝光後，藏傳佛教的狡辯，是完全禁不起分析，更得不到社會信任的。
執行長進一步逐句解析說明，藏傳佛教發言人辯稱：「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為」，事實上傳佛教經典「密續」中最高成就的「無上瑜伽」正是藉著再三再四的秘密灌頂，以男女雙身實修「樂空雙運」，達到所謂「樂空不二」而成就，這是藏傳佛教對內對外都已公開的事實。就連現任藏傳佛教最高精神領袖的第十四世達賴喇嘛，在其所著的達賴喇嘛文集（3）──《西藏佛教的修行道》第56頁中都曾寫道：「在無上瑜伽續中，即使是第一步的接受灌頂，都必在男性和女性佛交抱的面前成辦。五方佛必須有明妃陪伴。……此外，密續提到在圓滿次第的修行過程中，行者在到達某一境界時，就要尋找一位異性同修，作為進一步證道的衝力。在這些男女交合的情況中，如果有一方的證悟較高，就能夠促成雙方同時解脫或證果。」白紙黑字鐵證如山。
而另一本著作《達賴生死書》則以：「具有堅定慈悲及智慧的修行者，可以在修行之道上運用性交，以性交做為強大意識專注的方法，然後顯現出本有的澄明心。目的是要實證及延長心的更深刻層面，然後用此力量加強對空性的了悟。」清楚的說明了藏傳佛教所說的「慈悲及智慧」不過是指「在修行之道上運用性交」，而其「對空性的了悟」，也還是指在延長性交中以此「強大意識專注的方法」把淫樂中的覺知心，當成了佛法究竟的證境，殊不知這種淫樂境界其實與佛法的實證全然無關----八竿子也打不著。藏傳佛教的祖師爺宗喀巴，更主張藏傳佛教「修行人」，必須二六時中（每天24小時）不中斷雙身法的實修，更在其《密宗道次第廣論》卷十四戌二〈時輪規〉中，竟然教誡其藏傳佛教中的上師和弟子 ：「汝可殺有情，受用他人女，不與汝可取，一切說妄語。」因此，執行長表示藏傳佛教官方發言人的說詞純是狡辯，應該說為「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人『不從事』與女性有雙修的行為」，才符合事實。而宗喀巴正是達賴喇嘛所崇奉的黃教創教祖師，達瓦才仁又正是達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長，如今他在具有藏傳佛教正式法脈傳承的聖輪喇嘛爆出性侵醜聞時，出來謊稱「藏傳佛教絕不允許僧人與女性有雙修的行為，在台灣，有很多打著藏傳佛教或密宗名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」，仍是重施故計欺騙台灣人，這已證明達瓦才仁所說的這一類謊言都是不值得信任的，而他這一類謊言已經講過很多次了。
其次，對於藏傳佛教達瓦才仁所說的「在台灣，有很多打著『藏傳佛教』或『密宗』名目者，在外招搖撞騙，像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」，張執行長表示，從目前所見已經曝光的歷年來藏傳佛教性醜聞、性侵女信徒事件，涉案主角絕大多數都是具有喇嘛、上師的身份，甚至都是經過認證的法王、活佛、堪布、仁波切，具載於報端雜誌，現臉於電視螢幕，這都是大家眼見的事實；基金會所發放的公益DM已舉證不少事實例證，網路上原文轉載國外各大媒體的有關報導更是不勝枚舉。執行長也慨嘆，藏傳佛教喇嘛們在接受人家禮拜尊敬、供養大把鈔票時就大方的予以認證；一旦性侵案東窗事發，便立刻翻臉否認，指責這些依照宗喀巴教導而與女信徒合修雙身法的喇嘛是「騙術」，何其現實冷酷，真令人傻眼。更何況另有一些依附藏傳佛教的外圍團體或個人，他們會藉淫行設教修道，也都是直、間接學習藏傳佛教邪法而致。以致警檢蒐證，總是能查獲大批藏傳佛教獨有的書籍、文宣、禳祝儀軌和名相、唐卡、旗幡乃至種種「歡喜佛像」。這些都是三十年前台灣社會所沒有的現象，藏傳佛教正應為染污寶島這塊淨土而懺罪悔過；不料達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長達瓦才仁竟又如同以前一般不知自咎，反以責人，說什麼「在台灣，有很多打著『藏傳佛教』或『密宗』名目者，在外招搖撞騙」，等於指稱聖輪喇嘛是沒有正式傳承的假冒喇嘛，以圖繼續矇騙台灣人。執行長直斥，這正是標準的「做賊的喊捉賊」啊。
執行長指出，藏傳佛教的達瓦才仁說「像雙修、淫人妻這種就是騙術」；那麼達賴喇嘛在書中公然教導藏傳佛教信徒們「雙修、淫人妻」，那麼達瓦才仁的意思是不是說「達賴喇嘛的行為也是騙術」？不僅是在台灣，事實上在西藏、在大陸、在印度、在澳洲乃至一向最挺達賴的歐洲和美國，多年來「『藏傳佛教』或『密宗』一直在打著這一類名目，到處斂財騙色」；所經過的地方也都不斷的鬧出性侵、性醜聞，不但暴露在各大媒體上，甚至多有進入法律訴訟程序，並被判定罪刑。以致近年來世界上許多國家和地區已然清醒轉頭，紛紛對藏傳佛教開始做理性的觀察和省思，不再像早年對他們一味的好奇與盲信盲從。執行長表示，藏傳佛教這一方面早已在世界上顏面丟盡，達瓦才仁卻還在台灣這塊對他們極為寬容友善的地方裝無辜。
藏傳佛教達賴喇嘛西藏宗教基金會的董事長達瓦才仁還作態說：「若修行者對所修法門有疑義，可向基金會求證，是否為正統藏傳佛教的傳承者。」執行長指斥，藏傳佛教對現前發生的人證物證俱在的事實，都還在想盡辦法規避扭曲；對於薩加派哦巴法王祿頂堪仁波切親自授位傳法的「金剛阿闍黎」，並親自認證賜名、舉辦坐床大典的「貢噶仁千多杰仁波切」聖輪喇嘛，都能翻臉否認，前言後語不一樣。試問，如此還能向他們求證個什麼？何況密宗之門幽暗深似海，一旦藏傳佛教信徒「修行者對所修法門有疑義」，真的跑去問個傳承什麼的，只恐怕「鴨寮內沒有過夜的蚯蚓」，只有羊入虎口易入難出之虞；遠離藏傳佛教不暇，誰需要聽他們愈描愈黑的自說自話？
執行長指出，藏傳佛教聖輪仁波切的性侵疑雲，發展至今媒體已經有過「揭發」、「檢警再度搜寺」以及「深入各方訪談」等三波轉折的報導；而藏傳佛教的代表，達賴喇嘛的駐台官方發言人達瓦才仁也如同以往一般作了「否認」、「切割」和「轉移焦點」等三步驟，卻是硬拗而虛答的回應，就像烏賊狂吐墨汁一樣愈描愈黑。執行長表示，接下來藏傳佛教方面就要利用這一股「大家都已經各說各話」的障眼煙霧從中遁形，讓話題漸漸「淡化」，讓藏傳佛教喇嘛涉案性侵婦女的共同記憶漸被模糊。執行長呼應，社會大眾不能任由藏傳佛教片面發言脫困，就疏於追查事實的真相，因為若是失去社會大眾整體的持續警覺和關心，則受害於藏傳佛教邪淫迫害的婦女，是孤單無助而置身危險中的。
中時電子報報導：【在聖輪法師案中，引人好奇的就是圍繞在法師旁眾多「貼身助理」比丘尼們所扮演的角色。最早擔任助理的安師父到案後供稱，「命是師父救的，所以師父說的話都是對的」，她曾遭家暴，帶孩子逃出後，聖輪支助她的孩子讀書，讓她對聖輪的話絕對服從。】 【檢警調查發現，聖輪對「貼身比丘尼」已達完全洗腦程度，讓她們願意去找女信徒來與法師進行「心靈對話」，過程中還會試圖去降低女信徒們的戒心，在女信徒被猥褻、性侵同時，還會不斷安撫她們「這樣是正常的」、「這是必要的程序」，被害人在半推半就下被侵害，事後還會問比丘尼們『這樣是對的嗎？』】聞之令人不忍。
中時電子報 – 2011年11月15日
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%81%96%E8%BC%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%B8%AB%E6%B6%89%E6%80%A7%E4%BE%B5%E6%A1%88-%E6%AF%94%E4%B8%98%E5%B0%BC%E6%89%BE%E5%A5%B3%E7%9C%BE-%E6%B3%95%E5%B8%AB%E6%84%9B%E6%9E%97%E5%BF%97%E7%8E%B2%E6%AC%BE-213000188.html
張執行長表示，藏傳佛教正是利用台灣人民崇佛敬天的善根，在此「開疆拓土」紮根發展；也利用了台灣百姓尊師重道的善良稟性，對此地的信眾強取豪多予取予求。他們坐上高位享盡了信徒的膜拜和供養，一面又極其下作的利用藏傳佛教的邪淫教義和種種矯作方便，性侵女信徒並給女信徒的丈夫戴上綠帽子。更可惡的是他們假冒「佛教」之名而犯下這些惡做與罪行，把無量無邊的罪孽留給終其一生都在「這樣是對的嗎？」的惶惑和自我懷疑的女信眾們；甚至把直接、間接的「受害者」加重催眠，致使彼等因為罪疚內化而反投入「加害者」的一方。執行長指出，這樣的惡性循環，將使藏傳佛教的「弘傳」像滾雪球，或是更像癌細胞一樣的迅速畸形發展，不知底蘊的人還誤以為藏傳佛教多麼有感染力，事實上這個罪孽共同體的增生蔓延，必定腐蝕人心，瓦解道德藩籬和社會規範，使得台灣變得病態而脆弱，動搖整個社會的穩定和國家發展。
執行長指出，台灣這個社會一再經歷藏傳佛教帶來的衝擊、不堪和傷痛，事實已經證明正覺教育基金會一向的辯正和提醒是對的：藏傳佛教不是佛教，喇嘛不是佛門的修行人，他們的教義與邪見會導致學佛人修行的偏差、下墮，他們所依止的邪戒與邪修行會導致從學的女信徒受到性侵害。執行長呼籲，佛教及社會各界，以及社會大眾應該為維護台灣的安穩清淨、保護台灣的婦女同胞站出來，大家一面從加強宗教立法，加重宗教性侵的防制和罰則等站穩腳跟；另一面也從社會教育、加強宗教通識入手，使大家都能建立正確的宗教知見和信仰上的抉擇能力，讓山寨版的偽冒佛教現形，尤其讓壞人法身慧命的藏傳佛教遠離台灣，不再危害台灣的婦女。(採訪組報導)20111121
正覺教育基金會採訪組
此篇文章報導來自: http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/trueheart/165
2011-11-17
真心新聞網: 藏傳佛教仁波切 二度搜「密」二度驚
之前po過的文章有提到的：偏藏傳佛教密宗淫僧掐胸強吻女義工
（真心新聞網採訪組台北報導）藏傳佛教邪淫喇嘛貢噶仁千多杰仁波切（也就是台中聖德禪寺住持聖輪仁波切），對女義工猥褻案，台中檢警12日再度前往該寺搜索，檢警意外發現聖輪辦公室及禪寺內部相連，三樓是聖輪仁波切的房間，一樓是茶道教室，中間有秘密電梯可以相通，而且房間多到有如「迷宮」，更有複雜的秘密通道，甚至可以通到一樓後面的透天厝。警方更在聖輪仁波切房間裡搜出以黃色絲巾包裹的銅雕，疑似是藏傳佛教中男女裸身交合的「歡喜佛」，令警方咋舌，懷疑其和信徒所指「雙修」有關。
http://www.nownews.com/2011/11/13/11490-2757470.htm#ixzz1dbQIgeFt
http://video.chinatimes.com/video-cate-cnt.aspx?cid=4&nid=67752
正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕先生表示，許多眼尖的社會大眾都會發現，警方所查獲的「雙修」可疑證物「歡喜佛」，正是去年大喇喇在南北兩地公立博物館裡長期公開展覽過的所謂「藏傳佛教文物」啊！當時許多民眾對藏傳佛教的說詞：「這與淫慾無關，男身是代表『慈悲』，而『女身』則代表『智慧』。」都單純的信受而不懷疑，如今證明說歸說、做歸做，藏傳佛教的雙身法指的正是男女淫慾法。喇嘛們為了「修行」這個惡法，甚至不惜使用欺矇或強制手段，對女信徒騙色乃至進行性侵害。
警方同（12）日意外發現的，是寺內另兩名比丘尼(俗名董小安和柯妤)竟也涉嫌招攬女信徒，還協助聖輪在猥褻時從旁拍照，警方認為兩人涉嫌重大，帶回警局偵訊。兩名比丘尼雖然否認涉及不法，但不少被害人出面指控，其中還有人已經達到被性侵的程度，不少被害女子擔心事件遭曝光，才選擇隱忍不敢張揚。該二名比丘尼為何在聖輪仁波切猥褻女信徒時，在旁公然錄影？這是否顯示他們也認為雙修是藏傳佛教中理所當然的事情，所以在聖輪仁波切猥褻女信徒時無所忌諱而當場錄影下來？但為何女信徒們過去都隱忍、不吭氣？檢警指出，大多數是以為自己只是「個案」，誤認為單憑自己的指述不足以被警方採信；尤其是聖德禪寺用宗教力量去對他們「洗腦」，聖輪又是至高無上的精神領袖，加上其他尼姑都在一旁鼓吹：「能被選上雙修，是妳的福氣。」讓被害人雖然心有遲疑，但都不敢告訴其他人。
http://news.chinatimes.com/society/110503/112011111400144.html
http://www.nownews.com/2011/11/14/11490-2757567.htm#ixzz1dgD4fH5r
執行長進一步指出，這就是藏傳佛教所謂的男身「佛像」代表「慈悲」的背後意義。他們用催眠、洗腦的方式，把喇嘛上師對女信徒的性侵害，美化成是對女信徒「法」上的加持、「功德」的灌頂，謊話說久了就自然臉不紅氣不喘地予取予求，追隨的比丘尼是否因此而視為「佛法」之中本就應該如此男歡女愛，才會公然錄影而無所忌諱？執行長指出，最可悲的是那些喇嘛的從犯，因為可能先遭到魔手自陷纏縛，又怕秘密外洩，就只好不斷的拖人下水擴大其共犯結構，來自我說服證明自己依循藏傳假佛教的男女合體「修行」是對的。不知這是否就是報導當中「其他尼姑」那些不可思議的作為和說詞的肇因？執行長因此提醒誤入藏傳佛教的女眾，佛法中說的智慧是萬法實相的智慧，不是藏傳佛教中如何到達最強烈淫樂的知識；所有學密的女性應該立刻覺醒離開藏傳假佛教，才是真「智慧」；被仁波切當作性交工具而洩欲，並不是佛法中的實相智慧；繼續留在藏傳假佛教中，只會繫縛越陷越深，罪孽越背越重，卻毫無實相的「智慧」可求。
執行長再說明，所謂「歡喜佛像」，一點都不令人歡喜，因為那些事物與清淨莊嚴的真正「佛像」，是南轅北轍毫不相同的東西。執行長指出，藏傳佛教的「雙身像」，其實是在表徵他們所傳承的源頭----印度教性力派的法義核心。因此，雖然有極小部分借用佛像雕塑的藝術語言，但是大部分都在表顯性力派所崇奉信仰的那些六情五欲（就是世俗話裡常說的「七情六欲」）的凡夫鬼神情態。因此，常見有猙獰恐怖的所謂「憤怒本尊」造型，嗔心具足，與人們一向仰瞻濡慕慈悲祥和的佛菩薩聖像大異其趣。執行長表示，大眾常見的男女合抱的所謂「歡喜佛像」更是明顯可見的貪與癡的具體顯示，毫無智慧可言。修行人不肯思惟如何斷煩惱、除性障，反而雕塑表徵三毒煩惱的男女鬼神交合的造像來供奉膜拜，這非但與「慈悲」「智慧」無關，反而是極其「邪執」與「愚癡」的。
執行長還指出，令人可議的是聖輪這位仁波切的晦暗心思：在佛寺內竟然暗地廣設機關曲徑通幽，還有隱藏電梯直通自己臥榻，更有潛遁後路可以暗通民宅等等，究竟是在經營豔窟，還是毒窖？是想要為藏傳佛教密宗藏污，還是替黑道納垢？執行長指出，這些擺明了這位漢人喇嘛隱匿而複雜的心機，實在已經不是一位單純的出家修行人，而是鋪設種種陷阱，誘引良家婦女意圖誘姦或性侵的淫棍。
執行長指出，聖輪仁波切自邪皈依藏傳佛教之後，已然失去了佛教中出家比丘具足戒和菩薩戒的戒體，更利用其出家前所創辦，後一直沿用的的一貫道月刊「聖德雜誌」，以及另出報紙型「佛法山新聞」，收受募款、推銷其「佛法山」自種的鶴岡文旦、有機茶、有機農產品等，聚斂各路錢財，大肆違反出家僧人不許作買賣的戒律。並倡言「地球只有一個，我們不要再毒害它了。」（具見聖德雜誌第425期）執行長表示，這些說得好聽動人的話，和台灣另一些倡導有機耕作到處開設「有機商店」的「佛教寺院」一樣，都是表相愛護地球，聲稱「修福又修智」，實際上卻在暗中用研習藏傳假佛教中的邪法、邪教導──廣論來毒害廣大世人的法身慧命。經過了這麼多活生生實例的教訓，大家應該清醒，莫再受其蠱惑。
執行長表示，從聖輪喇嘛以藏傳佛教仁波切的身分，戴上藏傳佛教法帽，主法為人灌頂（聖德雜誌第425期P20），和其利用「聖德雜誌社」為工具而弘傳藏傳佛教教義，表彰藏傳佛教祖師而出版《密勒日巴尊者傳》等書，可知他早已背叛佛門，而以所受認證的藏傳佛教「貢噶仁千多杰仁波切」自居。既然如是，雖猶身著染色衣，但又披著藏傳佛教的絳紅色縵衣，日日熏修藏傳佛教的外道邪法，走上沈迷淫慾，終至誘姦及性侵女信徒而犯案曝光被收押，自是可想而知的事。執行長呼籲社會大眾要認清事實，莫因聖輪是土生土長的台灣人，就以為他還是正統佛門的出家人，他早已是不折不扣的佛教這頭獅子的身中蟲—藏傳假佛教的邪淫喇嘛矣。然而，他已經用藏傳假佛教的邪淫教義具體實行，再一次使正統佛教的所有出家人，因為他而無因無緣卻在實際上蒙羞了。（採訪組報導）20111116
正覺教育基金會採訪組
以上報導來自 http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/node/324
（真心新聞網採訪組台北報導）藏傳佛教邪淫喇嘛貢噶仁千多杰仁波切（也就是台中聖德禪寺住持聖輪仁波切），對女義工猥褻案，台中檢警12日再度前往該寺搜索，檢警意外發現聖輪辦公室及禪寺內部相連，三樓是聖輪仁波切的房間，一樓是茶道教室，中間有秘密電梯可以相通，而且房間多到有如「迷宮」，更有複雜的秘密通道，甚至可以通到一樓後面的透天厝。警方更在聖輪仁波切房間裡搜出以黃色絲巾包裹的銅雕，疑似是藏傳佛教中男女裸身交合的「歡喜佛」，令警方咋舌，懷疑其和信徒所指「雙修」有關。
http://www.nownews.com/2011/11/13/11490-2757470.htm#ixzz1dbQIgeFt
http://video.chinatimes.com/video-cate-cnt.aspx?cid=4&nid=67752
正覺教育基金會執行長張公僕先生表示，許多眼尖的社會大眾都會發現，警方所查獲的「雙修」可疑證物「歡喜佛」，正是去年大喇喇在南北兩地公立博物館裡長期公開展覽過的所謂「藏傳佛教文物」啊！當時許多民眾對藏傳佛教的說詞：「這與淫慾無關，男身是代表『慈悲』，而『女身』則代表『智慧』。」都單純的信受而不懷疑，如今證明說歸說、做歸做，藏傳佛教的雙身法指的正是男女淫慾法。喇嘛們為了「修行」這個惡法，甚至不惜使用欺矇或強制手段，對女信徒騙色乃至進行性侵害。
警方同（12）日意外發現的，是寺內另兩名比丘尼(俗名董小安和柯妤)竟也涉嫌招攬女信徒，還協助聖輪在猥褻時從旁拍照，警方認為兩人涉嫌重大，帶回警局偵訊。兩名比丘尼雖然否認涉及不法，但不少被害人出面指控，其中還有人已經達到被性侵的程度，不少被害女子擔心事件遭曝光，才選擇隱忍不敢張揚。該二名比丘尼為何在聖輪仁波切猥褻女信徒時，在旁公然錄影？這是否顯示他們也認為雙修是藏傳佛教中理所當然的事情，所以在聖輪仁波切猥褻女信徒時無所忌諱而當場錄影下來？但為何女信徒們過去都隱忍、不吭氣？檢警指出，大多數是以為自己只是「個案」，誤認為單憑自己的指述不足以被警方採信；尤其是聖德禪寺用宗教力量去對他們「洗腦」，聖輪又是至高無上的精神領袖，加上其他尼姑都在一旁鼓吹：「能被選上雙修，是妳的福氣。」讓被害人雖然心有遲疑，但都不敢告訴其他人。
http://news.chinatimes.com/society/110503/112011111400144.html
http://www.nownews.com/2011/11/14/11490-2757567.htm#ixzz1dgD4fH5r
執行長進一步指出，這就是藏傳佛教所謂的男身「佛像」代表「慈悲」的背後意義。他們用催眠、洗腦的方式，把喇嘛上師對女信徒的性侵害，美化成是對女信徒「法」上的加持、「功德」的灌頂，謊話說久了就自然臉不紅氣不喘地予取予求，追隨的比丘尼是否因此而視為「佛法」之中本就應該如此男歡女愛，才會公然錄影而無所忌諱？執行長指出，最可悲的是那些喇嘛的從犯，因為可能先遭到魔手自陷纏縛，又怕秘密外洩，就只好不斷的拖人下水擴大其共犯結構，來自我說服證明自己依循藏傳假佛教的男女合體「修行」是對的。不知這是否就是報導當中「其他尼姑」那些不可思議的作為和說詞的肇因？執行長因此提醒誤入藏傳佛教的女眾，佛法中說的智慧是萬法實相的智慧，不是藏傳佛教中如何到達最強烈淫樂的知識；所有學密的女性應該立刻覺醒離開藏傳假佛教，才是真「智慧」；被仁波切當作性交工具而洩欲，並不是佛法中的實相智慧；繼續留在藏傳假佛教中，只會繫縛越陷越深，罪孽越背越重，卻毫無實相的「智慧」可求。
執行長再說明，所謂「歡喜佛像」，一點都不令人歡喜，因為那些事物與清淨莊嚴的真正「佛像」，是南轅北轍毫不相同的東西。執行長指出，藏傳佛教的「雙身像」，其實是在表徵他們所傳承的源頭----印度教性力派的法義核心。因此，雖然有極小部分借用佛像雕塑的藝術語言，但是大部分都在表顯性力派所崇奉信仰的那些六情五欲（就是世俗話裡常說的「七情六欲」）的凡夫鬼神情態。因此，常見有猙獰恐怖的所謂「憤怒本尊」造型，嗔心具足，與人們一向仰瞻濡慕慈悲祥和的佛菩薩聖像大異其趣。執行長表示，大眾常見的男女合抱的所謂「歡喜佛像」更是明顯可見的貪與癡的具體顯示，毫無智慧可言。修行人不肯思惟如何斷煩惱、除性障，反而雕塑表徵三毒煩惱的男女鬼神交合的造像來供奉膜拜，這非但與「慈悲」「智慧」無關，反而是極其「邪執」與「愚癡」的。
執行長還指出，令人可議的是聖輪這位仁波切的晦暗心思：在佛寺內竟然暗地廣設機關曲徑通幽，還有隱藏電梯直通自己臥榻，更有潛遁後路可以暗通民宅等等，究竟是在經營豔窟，還是毒窖？是想要為藏傳佛教密宗藏污，還是替黑道納垢？執行長指出，這些擺明了這位漢人喇嘛隱匿而複雜的心機，實在已經不是一位單純的出家修行人，而是鋪設種種陷阱，誘引良家婦女意圖誘姦或性侵的淫棍。
執行長指出，聖輪仁波切自邪皈依藏傳佛教之後，已然失去了佛教中出家比丘具足戒和菩薩戒的戒體，更利用其出家前所創辦，後一直沿用的的一貫道月刊「聖德雜誌」，以及另出報紙型「佛法山新聞」，收受募款、推銷其「佛法山」自種的鶴岡文旦、有機茶、有機農產品等，聚斂各路錢財，大肆違反出家僧人不許作買賣的戒律。並倡言「地球只有一個，我們不要再毒害它了。」（具見聖德雜誌第425期）執行長表示，這些說得好聽動人的話，和台灣另一些倡導有機耕作到處開設「有機商店」的「佛教寺院」一樣，都是表相愛護地球，聲稱「修福又修智」，實際上卻在暗中用研習藏傳假佛教中的邪法、邪教導──廣論來毒害廣大世人的法身慧命。經過了這麼多活生生實例的教訓，大家應該清醒，莫再受其蠱惑。
執行長表示，從聖輪喇嘛以藏傳佛教仁波切的身分，戴上藏傳佛教法帽，主法為人灌頂（聖德雜誌第425期P20），和其利用「聖德雜誌社」為工具而弘傳藏傳佛教教義，表彰藏傳佛教祖師而出版《密勒日巴尊者傳》等書，可知他早已背叛佛門，而以所受認證的藏傳佛教「貢噶仁千多杰仁波切」自居。既然如是，雖猶身著染色衣，但又披著藏傳佛教的絳紅色縵衣，日日熏修藏傳佛教的外道邪法，走上沈迷淫慾，終至誘姦及性侵女信徒而犯案曝光被收押，自是可想而知的事。執行長呼籲社會大眾要認清事實，莫因聖輪是土生土長的台灣人，就以為他還是正統佛門的出家人，他早已是不折不扣的佛教這頭獅子的身中蟲—藏傳假佛教的邪淫喇嘛矣。然而，他已經用藏傳假佛教的邪淫教義具體實行，再一次使正統佛教的所有出家人，因為他而無因無緣卻在實際上蒙羞了。（採訪組報導）20111116
正覺教育基金會採訪組
以上報導來自 http://foundation.enlighten.org.tw/node/324
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)